ok, the princess is pregnant......isnt it suppose to be 9 months not 1 week???!!!!
a question about star wars episode lll *SPOILERS*
ok, the princess is pregnant......isnt it suppose to be 9 months not 1 week???!!!!
Not for space babies.
Well you see its-
I'm sorry, my response was set for a limited time, and now it's gone for good.
It was premature, duh.
there was a picture here
I think it was premature, besides she could have been pregnant for quite awhile before she got the chance to tell him.
Angelic Demon child
Those were Darth Maul's babies. His species goes through the birth cycle in one 2hr feature.
Vader is such a sucker.
Smile even though its breaking
no, because she didnt look fat and stuff, plus she had twins so it would of shown
She was late in the stages of pregnancy. Done deal.
It could have been slightly premature, but regardless, she didnt get to till Anakin until she was showing, so she was in the later stages of pregnancy.
Weeks and months could have passed during the course of the storyline. It's not too far fetched.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
Ditto what Del said.
Chaos
Considering how Anakin grows up, yet Padme stays the same age, it looks like FILM SPEED was at work in this one.
It was the Force.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
the most time tht happened wuz a like............a week?
What are you basing that assumption on?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
