Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: Better or worse Square Soft/Enix

  1. #16
    programmed by NASIR Recognized Member black orb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    RIP Chavez 1954-2013
    Posts
    7,613
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Banner Design
    • Logo Design

    Default

    >>> I think the merging was a great idea specially for Enix, just look at Dragon Warrior VIII.
    >> The black orb glitters ominously... but nothing happens..

  2. #17

    Default

    And look at all the upskirt shots that were in FFX-2

    But seriosuly, Enix's material seemed questionable to me at times before the merge.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeza
    This thread did not require Phoenix Down. Do not revive dead threads.

  3. #18
    HEIDEGGER SI MY BISHI!!!1 DJZen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    4,558

    Default

    How so?

  4. #19

    Default

    well, Square Enix hasnt really had the time to make a Game
    FFX-2 already had its principles and settings/atmosphere
    I know better games from Squaresoft, so its Squaresoft
    But Square-Enix can fully show what they have got with FFXII....

  5. #20

    Default

    FF12 had better be good, that's all I gotta say. Enix made some sweet RPGs, Squaresoft made sweet RPGs, so together, they own the field. The upcoming games had better be good though. I've waited so long for the next FF. 11 doesn't count since it was online.

  6. #21
    HEIDEGGER SI MY BISHI!!!1 DJZen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    4,558

    Default

    VII didn't count because it was futuristic. :rolleyes2

  7. #22

    Default FFX-2

    That is the Best Game ever!!!
    ^___^

  8. #23
    HI GEORGE I AM! OK!
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    I live in ontario canada.
    Posts
    284

    Default

    squaresoft.
    ffx(FANTASTIC)
    ff7(FANTASTIC)

    enix
    ffx-2(HORRIBLE RANCID AWFULL)

    done

  9. #24
    Banned Sepho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Twilight Zone
    Posts
    1,812
    Articles
    8

    Default

    Enix didn't develop Final Fantasy X-2, though. The merger only affects business/corporate decisions anyway. They still for the most part (if not completely) make games indepentently of each other other.

    Besides, collaborating on a few development projects probably wouldn't be a bad thing.

  10. #25
    That's me! blackmage_nuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    8,503
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    sword of mana wasnt bad, i think it was square enix

    i dont care what its called as long as its part square, but i guess having to put the space bar in the words square enix gets annoying for me, so i'll have to go with squaresoft

  11. #26
    Banned UWAOOOOU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    post in my user notes for sex appeal!
    Posts
    428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yuna Braska 19
    That is the Best Game ever!!!
    ^___^
    Thanks for clearing that up.

  12. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackmage_nuke
    sword of mana wasnt bad, i think it was square enix

    i dont care what its called as long as its part square, but i guess having to put the space bar in the words square enix gets annoying for me, so i'll have to go with squaresoft
    I still call them Square... and yes, SoM was developed by Square Enix

  13. #28
    Those...eyebrows... Recognized Member XxSephirothxX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    SFCA
    Posts
    7,102
    Articles
    181
    Contributions
    • Former Senior Site Staff
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    I won't pretend to really enjoy the Dragon Warrior games, from what I've played, but I'm guessing VIII will be fantastic. Overall I think they're a better company after the merger--they're more powerful now and can't exactly be forced to do whatever Sony wants. After the Spirits Within flop, Sony basically kept them out of bankruptcy by buying a lot of Square's stock, I believe, so they had an unsettling amount of control over what they could and couldn't do. Considering the amount of time they existed as Square and the much shorter amount of time they've been Square-Enix, it's unreasonable to expect them to be popping out as many good titles.

  14. #29
    squareSOFT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dead in some gutter
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Judging the quality of SE games compared to Squaresoft games would be premature. However since Enix joined what has happened to the FF series? Delay,Delay,Delay. Fewer good non-series games are being released (Xenogears, Vagrant Story,) and we've got how many spinoffs to FF7 coming? I dont like the merger, but given the circumstances it was probably unavoidable.
    Last edited by squareSOFT; 08-28-2005 at 05:59 PM.
    Organized people are just to lazy to look for things.

  15. #30
    Paganini is a bastard. Rengori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Under Avarice's bed (Los Angeles)
    Posts
    8,147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by §håd0w
    Quote Originally Posted by blackmage_nuke
    sword of mana wasnt bad, i think it was square enix

    i dont care what its called as long as its part square, but i guess having to put the space bar in the words square enix gets annoying for me, so i'll have to go with squaresoft
    I still call them Square... and yes, SoM was developed by Square Enix
    And it was made by Square several years ago going under the identity "Final Fantasy Adventure".
    JOY IS A BITCH, but she is so adorable!
    generated by sloganizer.net
    Kaycee says (12:06 AM):
    whos' obama?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •