de menzes

[Psychotic]

Ah, finally, proof of what you are saying. Thank you. That totally comprehends what the initial witnesses said, but I still think it is best to wait for the final report.

As for that evidence, it proves only what we already knew: He wasn't a terrorist. What part of it shows malicious intent?

Are the officers truly at fault, if they are told over the radio that a suspect is indeed a terrorist and they have authorisation to kill, and then see him run onto a train (the news report says he ran on the platform, although it also says he "quickened his step" - I suppose what happened is still unclear)? I don't think so. It was a series of errors in intelligence made by several people that caused the death, not one person's decision to, as cloud no 9 put it, "teach those bloody towelheads a lesson". No malice, in my opinion, so no murder.