Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 99

Thread: Whats wrong with planning a childs sex?

  1. #76
    Shlup's Retired Pimp Recognized Member Raistlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Spying on Unne and BUO
    Posts
    20,583
    Articles
    101
    Blog Entries
    45
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor

    Default

    ...like what?

  2. #77
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Dammit, I knew you were going to ask for an example. I dunno, world explosion or something!

  3. #78
    Shlup's Retired Pimp Recognized Member Raistlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Spying on Unne and BUO
    Posts
    20,583
    Articles
    101
    Blog Entries
    45
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShlupQuack
    Dammit, I knew you were going to ask for an example. I dunno, world explosion or something!
    And why is a world explosion bad? Because it kills people. Why is that bad? Because life is valued.

  4. #79
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I'm sure I could come up with some examples of why it would be worth sacrificing some measure of individual life for some vague notion of "the greater good" but I don't think I want to put effort into coming up with vague hypothetical situations.

  5. #80
    Shlup's Retired Pimp Recognized Member Raistlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Spying on Unne and BUO
    Posts
    20,583
    Articles
    101
    Blog Entries
    45
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor

    Default

    The "greater good" is the most evil notion impressed on mankind.

    I could conceive of giving my life for a cause such as freedom - but since you haven't mentioned that, I assume you realize that freedom is based on the value of the individual.

  6. #81
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    You're starting to go in circles again.

  7. #82
    Banned nik0tine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dalmasca!
    Posts
    12,133

    Default

    Or why shouldn't they? Parents have a lot of control over their offspring that the children themselves don't have.
    But there are some things that they should not have much control over. One of these things is the childs body.

    THEY made the decision to make the baby. Until that baby has a mind of his/her own, that embryo/fetus is property. The same justification goes to abortion.
    Bull. Total bull. They made the decision to have the child, and now they have to live with it. A fetus is not property, and neither is a child.

    Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin
    A morality which does not value individual life is not worth considering.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin
    Until that baby has a mind of his/her own, that embryo/fetus is property. The same justification goes to abortion.

  8. #83
    Proudly Loathsome ;) DMKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,306

    FFXIV Character

    Efes Ephesus (Adamantoise)

    Default

    Kids are property? Awesome, now I know I'm having children.
    I like Kung-Fu.

  9. #84
    Grimoire of the Sages ShunNakamura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Northwest Ohio
    Posts
    2,919

    Default

    Something that I think is important is exactly how/when this is done. You see for all we know it could be an injection you take before having sex that does this(I highly.. highly doubt this as likely). But lets say that is how it is done. This I would not have a problem with.

    Right after conception. This is, in my mind, the most probable timeframe. If it doesn't harm the child(which to my knowledge it doesn't) it must happen early on. Again here I don't have a problem.

    When I do have a problem is when there is a good chance that it will harm or otherwise damage the child.


    STILL Updating the anime list. . . I didn't think I was that much of an anime freak! I don't even want to consider updating the manga list!

  10. #85
    Banned ThroneofDravaris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    What? Right now?
    Posts
    1,687

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin
    And we definitely can't pierce the ears of a five-year-old girl, because that's changing her physically!
    What the hell? what kind of sick, twisted f@#$ would piece the ears of a five year old?

  11. #86
    Quack Shlup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    34,993
    Articles
    14
    Blog Entries
    37
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThroneofDravaris
    Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin
    And we definitely can't pierce the ears of a five-year-old girl, because that's changing her physically!
    What the hell? what kind of sick, twisted f@#$ would piece the ears of a five year old?
    Uhh... A lot of people. It's commonplace for parents to have their infant daughter's ears pierced.

    Not that I approve. Just sayin'.

  12. #87

    Default

    I just don't think that we know enough yet to safley do this... It's like giving a five year old fireworks: Somthing bad will prolly happen.

    Genetic Alteration is insanley evil and will prolly a hot topic here in a few years. When people are all genetically enhanced to be 'perfect' in the scewed minds of thier parents. Then guess what... hitler won.

    Bipper

  13. #88
    Banned nik0tine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dalmasca!
    Posts
    12,133

    Default

    So, nik0tine - I guess we shouldn't give toddlers a football, because that's choosing something for them. Or we might not want to force kids to go to school, because that is too. And we definitely can't pierce the ears of a five-year-old girl, because that's changing her physically!
    I didn't see this earlier, but this is just too stupid for me to pass up. Let's break this down bit by bit.

    So, nik0tine - I guess we shouldn't give toddlers a football, because that's choosing something for them.
    That toddler doesn't have to use that football, now does he?

    Or we might not want to force kids to go to school, because that is too.
    You can use your head here. Stupid statements like this don't warrent anything other than a rude reply, if that. Great way to twist my words to get your mute point across.

    And we definitely can't pierce the ears of a five-year-old girl, because that's changing her physically!
    You're right. No, we can't. That is, if she doesn't go along with it. If mommy and daddy want her ears peirced, and she says no, then that's all there is too it. Mom and Dad need to deal with. Under no circumstance is it okay for a parent to peirce a childs ears without their consent.

  14. #89
    absolutely haram Recognized Member Madame Adequate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kirkwall
    Posts
    23,357

    FFXIV Character

    Hiero Dule (Brynhildr)
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bipper
    I just don't think that we know enough yet to safley do this... It's like giving a five year old fireworks: Somthing bad will prolly happen.

    Genetic Alteration is insanley evil and will prolly a hot topic here in a few years. When people are all genetically enhanced to be 'perfect' in the scewed minds of thier parents. Then guess what... hitler won.

    Bipper
    Oh for the love of...

    The fact that Hitler attempted eugenics does not make eugenics evil. Any more than the fact that Hitler was vegetarian makes vegetarianism evil. Or hell, Stalin and Hitler both had mustaches! Mustaches must be evil!

  15. #90

    Default

    HAHa!

    No I am just talking about the prefect race. Hitler wanted this above all. Everyone to be full blooded german I am just merly saying that if we could alter all the other genetics as well, what is to stop us from making a supposed supirror race? On that I am saying that hitlers view on making the perfect race was evil, not the fact that genetic alteration is evil because he did it.

    Thanks for the heads up on vegetarians though!

    Bipper
    Last edited by bipper; 08-21-2005 at 02:57 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •