Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: FF shoulda been on other systems

  1. #1

    Default FF shoulda been on other systems

    Geeze what were they thinking?! Square would have made so much more money and a way bigger fan base. Plus FF would have played way better on the GCN and Xbox. They're more powerful. Just look at other cross platform games. There's always something about the PS2 version that makes it... not as good as the others. Hopefully they'll keep their word on it when they say they'll start making FF's cross platform games on next-gen systems.
    What the %#$&!!!

    -Cid

  2. #2
    Draw the Drapes Recognized Member rubah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Now Destiny is done.
    Posts
    30,655
    Blog Entries
    21
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I have no reason for them to go cross-platform as I don't own any of those other systems.

  3. #3
    troublesome tailz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    where the hell am I
    Posts
    1,082

    Default

    i lvoe ps2 and i think ff belongs there

    and btw the xbox and gamecube controllers suck
    Too big. <-- yeah i heard that one before

  4. #4

    Default

    well rubah of coarse you wouldn't care, but what about the others that can't afford a PS2 cause they had already bought another system?

    and tailz I don't think those are valid reasons not to have them on another system.
    What the %#$&!!!

    -Cid

  5. #5
    Paganini is a bastard. Rengori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Under Avarice's bed (Los Angeles)
    Posts
    8,147

    Default

    If they wanted to play FF, they would have bought a PlayStation. Square has given enough games to Sony that it's obvious they'll stay there.
    JOY IS A BITCH, but she is so adorable!
    generated by sloganizer.net
    Kaycee says (12:06 AM):
    whos' obama?

  6. #6

    Default

    Yeah, but what if they wanted to play other awsome games on other systems like Halo, or Zelda, or even Metroid Prime?

    And Square has also given alot to Nintendo, pretty obvious that they didn't stay there.
    What the %#$&!!!

    -Cid

  7. #7
    lomas de chapultepec Recognized Member eestlinc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    brooklyn
    Posts
    17,552
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Sony helped get Square out of some financial trouble, thus the exclusivity of the games.

  8. #8

    Default

    well recently there's been:

    FFCC...GameCube
    FFTA...GameBoy Advance

    and FFXI coming soon to XBOX 360. still, Final Fantasy should have a devout loyalty to Sony. ya know what would be a good deal -- lets have some Zelda games on PS2.

  9. #9

    Default

    It costs a lot more than people realize to port games across all systems. You basically have to re-program most of the game, sometimes even the graphics, and deffinitely the control scheme for each system, among other things I can't think of. Exclusives actually turn a profit a lot easier from what I've heard on these arguments in magazines. Plus exclusives can more easily milk the machine they're made for, instead of doing the lowest common denominator thing most cross-platform games do. But really I think its a financial issue. Like I said, from what I gathered from articles, multi-platform games have to sell an insane amount compared to exclusives to turn a profit.



  10. #10

    Default

    Yeah, but we're not talking about "Metal Arms: Glitch In the System" here. This is final fantasy we're talking about here. You could almost be positive that many many many people would by it for another system.

    As for zelda on the PS2; yes it's all about money. Zelda is pretty much nintendo's main weapon against the other 2 companies.
    What the %#$&!!!

    -Cid

  11. #11
    Paganini is a bastard. Rengori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Under Avarice's bed (Los Angeles)
    Posts
    8,147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dudius
    As for zelda on the PS2; yes it's all about money. Zelda is pretty much nintendo's main weapon against the other 2 companies.
    OMG LIEK ITS NOT MARIO??????1
    JOY IS A BITCH, but she is so adorable!
    generated by sloganizer.net
    Kaycee says (12:06 AM):
    whos' obama?

  12. #12
    Not a Banana Mo-Nercy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    5,277
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rengori
    Quote Originally Posted by Dudius
    As for zelda on the PS2; yes it's all about money. Zelda is pretty much nintendo's main weapon against the other 2 companies.
    OMG LIEK ITS NOT MARIO??????1
    Sony doesn't really have a weapon though. Unless you consider Crash Bandicoot (dead) and Lara Croft (really really dead) weapons. The PS has always just been able to attract more consumers through a wider selection of games.

    The XBox had Halo going for it. That's about it.

    And just wait till PS3. We'll have some golden gaming moments on that thing.

  13. #13
    Paganini is a bastard. Rengori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Under Avarice's bed (Los Angeles)
    Posts
    8,147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mo-Nercy
    The XBox had Halo going for it. That's about it.
    And the XBox wold be lying in a ditch somewhere if Halo didn't come to the rescue.
    JOY IS A BITCH, but she is so adorable!
    generated by sloganizer.net
    Kaycee says (12:06 AM):
    whos' obama?

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mo-Nercy
    Quote Originally Posted by Rengori
    Quote Originally Posted by Dudius
    As for zelda on the PS2; yes it's all about money. Zelda is pretty much nintendo's main weapon against the other 2 companies.
    OMG LIEK ITS NOT MARIO??????1
    Sony doesn't really have a weapon though. Unless you consider Crash Bandicoot (dead) and Lara Croft (really really dead) weapons. The PS has always just been able to attract more consumers through a wider selection of games.

    The XBox had Halo going for it. That's about it.

    And just wait till PS3. We'll have some golden gaming moments on that thing.
    Sony doesn't need a weapon. If anything their system is their weapon. Their reputation, which gets more companies to make games for them is their weapon.

    But yeah have you seen the Killzone PS3 trailer? Amazing.
    What the %#$&!!!

    -Cid

  15. #15
    Not a Banana Mo-Nercy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    5,277
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rengori
    Quote Originally Posted by Mo-Nercy
    The XBox had Halo going for it. That's about it.
    And the XBox wold be lying in a ditch somewhere if Halo didn't come to the rescue.
    I don't know if you're being sarcastic, but it doesn't matter because it's true and y'all know it. *pictures XBox in a ditch*

    Must be some friggin' huge ditch.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •