3-headed dogs and Cerberus.
3-headed dogs and Cerberus.
I'm sure love and hate can be debated into it. Or also out of it, depending on your deffinitions and perspectives. But considering the ups and downs of life, I'll stick with it as an answer. They don't always have to be extreme
You're going about the opposite there, my good friend xDOriginally Posted by GrimmReaper
Oh, and sorry, Pssy, but Fluffy in the first harry potter book was definitely not cerberus
Kishi and Tentacles
Grab the opportunities life hands you, that's my motto!
nik0tine and this.
me and penguins.
I think you're being to harsh with the rules. the first cannot be without the second and still be. that's my view of it. "penguins and me" would be different because penguins can be without me and still be.
But denffe, then it wouldn't be mutually inclusive.
YOU ARE MISSING THE MUTUAL PART OF THIS.
It's supposed to be hard. That's why I posted it xD
Wouldn't the negation/reciprocal of a mutually exclusive pair be a pair whose elements come into contact at least once?
Counting the number of times is a gray zone. Never and always are the recipricals
I'd say movement and time more than space and time.
.opt
Incorrect. I wasn't asking, I was telling.
edit: Sup Optium. Way to sneak in.
Last edited by -N-; 08-17-2005 at 04:47 AM.
As I have already told you neel, keep your dirty maths out of this! >>>>:OOOOOOOO
Psychotic and psychotic?
Wat
is
going
on
wtf
rawr
w...t...f???
Making a slow come back since 2008
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
