-
That was brilliant, Thingie. You REALLY didn't need the red herrings, you know.
The part where you put three phrases, all anagrams of eachother together... that was amazing. You did that in TWO hours? Crazy.
You may come off as a little vain (possibly conceited), but I guess you deserve more praise. I can't even think of an instance of anyone creating a riddle so complex.
I agree with Sir Bahamut in that parts of your riddle were extremely obscure. Did you really expect anyone to ever figure out those anagrams? It looks to me like you were just searching for anagrams and then have it come off as clever. As for the three anagrams, which are all anagrams to another phrase (In latin for god's sake! "The vale of genus Cedrus"? riiigghtt), no way were those accidents.
Still though, I think you gave enough clues to where someone, who were thinking in just the right way about one of your phrases, could have deduced the answer. For instance, "O, keen watchman to mine own, falter not, To vouchsafe designs most astronomic." Just someone connecting 'stars' with the actor/actresses in the play could have easily found the general area where the answer is related. Several phrases, without even going into the weird anagrams, could have deduced the answer without too much thought.
Also, if you play the game normally and notice Lav's name and think it might be obscure enough to be the answer to Thingie's riddle, then most certainly, I think it's possible. I fact, I'm quite surprised it was not aswered already. I have picked al the answers at the ticket booth, and I STILL didn't notice Lav's name for some reason, but I disgess.
Anyway, all I have to say is: Brilliant! Thingie, you are amazing. A god in proportions (not really, but yeah). Soak up the praise, because you don't get enough of it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules