I thought SF flowed better than the old Mortal Kombat games, but the ones on the current generation are great. No palette swaps, each character has three unique fighting styles, weapons are in and the characters themselves are largely pretty cool. There are some cliches and whatnot, but Sf has them too.
But what really makes MK stand out for me is the evolution from MK1 up to MK Deception. Since the start they've added new characters and moves constantly (MKTrilogy was the only one where they had ALL the palette swapped ninjas), and now it plays really well if all you're looking for is a good laugh and a friendly kickabout.
How much has SF really changed since SF2? And I don't mean all the little niggling [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] with stats and whatnot that virtually no one notices, I mean big differences. If you can beat someone at SF2 odds are you can beat them at any SF game.



Reply With Quote