View Poll Results: So?

Voters
62. You may not vote on this poll
  • Street Fighter (YES!)

    31 50.00%
  • Mortal Kombat (BOO!)

    31 50.00%
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 101

Thread: Mortal Kombat vs. Street Fighter

  1. #61
    This is England
    Papa Waigo
    Recognized Member DK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    All the time in Sunny Beach
    Posts
    7,921
    Articles
    25
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    Different moves, even slight ones, make it count. Even if they were only there for one game they count, because in the start of MK there were only two ninjas, Sub Zero and Scorpion, so yeah.

    Edit: How is Allen like Dan? He has a Hadoken, a Shoryuken and a special flying kick style move, and his super is the same as Ryu's Shinkuu Hadoken.

  2. #62

    Default

    Yeah, but he's not Shotokhan. He's probably erither a trainee or using a similar art. Judging from those white bandages on his arms he's probably got a bit of Muay Thai.

  3. #63
    Δ As above, so below ∇ crashNUMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    hmm.
    Posts
    6,891
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kawaii Ryűkishi
    Harpooner of Hearts
    Lmao!! Isn't that the Man?? Or just that pic he has??

  4. #64
    Northern String Twanger Shoden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Somewhere In Time
    Posts
    6,710
    Blog Entries
    4

    FFXIV Character

    Spykus Hallideus (Cerberus)

    Default

    Mortal Kombat was an amazing game i despised Street fighter because it was boring.

    Mortal Kombat's system is a smurf load better you can slam thew enemy through windows, through the floor and throw them into a sea of pirhanas <3

    Deception was great including Baraka

    LET THE HAMMER FALL

  5. #65
    HEIDEGGER SI MY BISHI!!!1 DJZen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    4,558

    Default

    Unlike MK, SF doesn't need to rely on cheap gimmicks like blood or pirahnas to be good. Besides that, Mortal Kombat will NEVER EVER EVER have a character as awesome as Dan.

    We shouldn't even be discussing this, we should be discussing whether Street Fighter or King of Fighters kicks Mortal Kombat's broke ass more. I personally feel that while SF delivers an elegant axe kick to MK's spine, KoF does a bit of a curb stomp to it.

  6. #66
    Fei Gone Wrong Polnareff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,266
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJZen
    Okay, so that makes....

    Ryu, Ken, Akuma, Sean, Evil Ryu, Shin Akuma, Violent Ken, and "Allen".

    MK, by the same token has...

    Scorpion, Sub Zero, Reptile, Rain, Ermac, Smoke, Noob Saibot, and Khameleon.

    Now they're tied for greatest number of cheap knockoff characters, unless this "Allen" who I've never heard of before is actually a joke.

    Also, as an afterthough, anyone who accuses SF of turning into a projectile fest has never played for very long. Any player can throw a fireball, but any GOOD player can make you seriously regret throwing that fireball.
    Allen doesn't exactly count, as he wasn't made by Capcom. (Heck, the EX series itself wasn't made by them :P)

    But on the MK side, you can't forget the Cyber Ninjas, like Sektor, and Cyrax, and I think there's a couple other ones as well.
    Xenogears is the tragic story of how your whole life can take a crappy turn, just because you happened to see a lady in a wedding dress before her wedding.

    This boy is crackin' up, this boy has broken down
    This boy is crackin' up, this boy has broke down

  7. #67
    Nothing special Pure Strife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Ye Olde England
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    I thought SF flowed better than the old Mortal Kombat games, but the ones on the current generation are great. No palette swaps, each character has three unique fighting styles, weapons are in and the characters themselves are largely pretty cool. There are some cliches and whatnot, but Sf has them too.

    But what really makes MK stand out for me is the evolution from MK1 up to MK Deception. Since the start they've added new characters and moves constantly (MKTrilogy was the only one where they had ALL the palette swapped ninjas), and now it plays really well if all you're looking for is a good laugh and a friendly kickabout.

    How much has SF really changed since SF2? And I don't mean all the little niggling [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] with stats and whatnot that virtually no one notices, I mean big differences. If you can beat someone at SF2 odds are you can beat them at any SF game.
    [leeza]Total sig height should not be over 250 pixels, including all text.[/leeza]

  8. #68

    Default

    I'll fill in your question, Strife.

    SFII= Standard fighting
    SFII Turbo=Adjustable combat speed, different pallet swaps, and playable boss characters
    Super SFII Turbo= 4 new characters, 8 different pallet swaps for each character, and super moves that can be done when your super bar fills up.
    SF Alpha= 3 different combat styles for each combatant, and multiple super moves. Plus custom combos
    Street Fighter III- Super Arts that the player chooses, EX moves, and the finest tuned controls I ever seen.

  9. #69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shoden
    Mortal Kombat at least it's more violent, you can throw people to pirhanas!
    or rip out their spines, or turn in to a bunny and eat them, or burn them to death.
    It looks like the ground had a sex change.

  10. #70

    Default

    So killing people is alot more fun than a fight with substance and challenge?

  11. #71
    Northern String Twanger Shoden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Somewhere In Time
    Posts
    6,710
    Blog Entries
    4

    FFXIV Character

    Spykus Hallideus (Cerberus)

    Default

    Mortal Kombat has a better storyline.

    Mortal Kombat gives you a bigger sense of satisfication than SF

    LET THE HAMMER FALL

  12. #72

    Default

    its personal choice everyone, so dont judge or question peoples views...

  13. #73
    Northern String Twanger Shoden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Somewhere In Time
    Posts
    6,710
    Blog Entries
    4

    FFXIV Character

    Spykus Hallideus (Cerberus)

    Default

    anyway whats wrong with gore and several ways of killing?

    LET THE HAMMER FALL

  14. #74
    Banned MecaKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,002

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Holmes
    So killing people is alot more fun than a fight with substance and challenge?
    Of course, that's why people buy Mortal Kombat and GTA instead of crappy 2D fighters!

  15. #75
    HEIDEGGER SI MY BISHI!!!1 DJZen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    4,558

    Default

    Well, for one thing, I got over it back in highschool. Gore in games is just so ubiquitous in games anymore that it just doesn't do anything for me anymore. It's like that one song that you hear on the radio every 5 seconds. At first it's cool, then it's everywhere, then it's annoying.

    Mortal Kombat RELIES on schlock value. Imagine if it didn't have blood or fatalities. It would have died out shortly after the first like every other fighting game that came out in 1994. I can't even name all the fighting games that came out during that time period, that's how many there were.

    Besides, Time Killers was WAY more violent than MK. I don't hear anybody singing that game's praises.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •