charles clarke. the uk home secretary has a wacky idea. lets deport people. not a new idea. but lets deport them not for a crim in another country but one in the uk. lets just send them back to their "country of origin". shall we try them first? no. do they need to have committed a crime? no. what do they need to have done? "unaccpetable behaviour". he has a whole list of things that you can be sent away from. saying a jihad s good, saying martyrom is good, the usual evil stuf those "dirty muslims" try and say.
but there are laws against this right? yes. the human rights act of the eu and un as well as a few others. oh yes it's vey illegal. does this do anything else? oh yes it does. we can deport them to countries that practice torture. and we're allowed to do that? hell no we're not. so they will torture them? no because we asked them not to and they said they wouldn't so it must be fine.
is it just me who sees the flaw in this whole plan? why did we need assurances that they wouldn't be tortured if we were sure they wouldn't be tortured. we should not be sending people to countries which practice it. having to ask proves that we think or know they do. that is so stupid and illegal it's insane.
and to send back untried men? what is this sudan? zimbabwe?
so what we are doing is sending back untried men who haven't committed a legal crime to countries which practice torture. and this will start this week.
thoughts?