http://in.news.yahoo.com/050825/139/5zuzq.html
This isn't meant to offend. But aren't you all just laughing?
http://in.news.yahoo.com/050825/139/5zuzq.html
This isn't meant to offend. But aren't you all just laughing?
I betchoo those two professor guys cheated somehow and changed the results.It simply cannot be!
![]()
Last edited by Resha; 08-29-2005 at 06:04 PM.
That was most excellent.
w
o
w
...man, this guy deserves some credit:
![]()
Last edited by Yuffie514; 08-30-2005 at 01:43 AM.
Im not trying too sound snobby, But arent all ( most ) the historic scientists men anywayz.
but to tell you the truth, that was History
And the average man resembles a Pork Pie than anything else now..........
What else would a professor be?Originally Posted by Resha
He shoots, he scores,
SWISH.
This also goes that men are also better drivers than women, but this is old news to me
Not that I'm saying it's blatanly untrue, but I'd have to have a lot more information before I gave that study any credit. "IQ" is known in psychology to be a cheap but not terribly reliable measure of aptitude, among other possible flaws in the whole thing.
I doubt those things would account for such a large-spanned ratio though. So hooray for males.
Doesn't that also say that guys are more prone to be loser nerds?
It was obvious wasn't it.
Men never threw themselves in front of a horse to get the right to vote did they?
This study was doen by:
Originally Posted by the article
MEN!
Therefore they are too smart and the results should be perfect lol
Bipper
That's a completely stupid statement. There's no link between how smart some one is and how much of a nerd they are.
I know of at least 10 people who are nerdier than Urkel, but are as thick at [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img].