Why............

[Cloud No.9]

i refuse to have an avatar or sig. make them tiny!!!

[Vyk]

Its better than AIM buddy icons :D

[MoonsEcho]

Large avatars and sigs are eyesores. Everything is fine the way it is.

[Faris]

I agree with MoonsEcho. When you see all sorts of sizes while looking at a thread. You start thinking that they're alive, or your eyes are playing a trick on you.

[Samuraid]

Why do they need to be this small ?

Simple. So something like this doesn't happen:

Yes, that is a real animated GIF avatar on the dbz tribute forums.

[Agent Proto]

The way the forums are, having larger avatars would make the forums look messier. For the record, EoFF always used 60 x 60.

[nik0tine]

I demand a 1000x1000 avatar limit!

[Agent Proto]

60 x 60 avatars are more aesthetically appealing than larger avatar anyway.

[Polyonymous]

I agree that it is tough to get a good avatar to 60 x 60 (at least for me), but I do like it better this way.

[Sepho]

I'm pretty used to the 60x60 avatar size. I think anything considerably larger looks kind of tacky.

[rubah]

I for one wouldn't mind a larger avatar size, but after a while of watching, I have come to the realization that it is not going to happen.

although I wish we could use lj icons ;_;

[MecaKane]

Maybe we can have 50kb avatars with 5kb sigs! <_<

[Dr Unne]

I think the actual reason for this is that EZBoard only allowed 60x60.

[Meat Puppet]

Hey cool, proto used my title for him.

[Shlup]

I would not want to be a member of a 60,0000 member message board. Quantity != Quality