Quote Originally Posted by Hsu
Quote Originally Posted by Cloud No.9
becauase like the oscars and stuff the greatness of anything should be determined by the educated few not the masses. critics know what is best compared to folk who buy the games. look at how many movie tie ins get to no1 in the charts but are total crap.

voting and popular numbers are not a way to judge anything.
Actually, video game critics suck, and have a previous history of being paid off for a positive opinion of a game.
*cough*GAMEINFORMER*cough* Mortal Kombat Deception was an improvement over MK: DA but a 9.5? Right.

Anyway, I don't really trust a lot of game critics because most of them have their own agenda. I hate to pick on Game Informer again, but they do this all the time. I remember they gave a Mario Party title a 2.0 just because they are sick of it. I don't really like Mario Party titles myself, but I thought it was VERY unprofessional of them to rate the game on a personal level like that. I understand that you have to be personal to an extent, but giving a game a bad score because you personally thought the series should stop is very immature.