Quote Originally Posted by Behold the Void
There's a big difference between a terrorist and someone merely labeled a terrorist. Ghandi was not a terrorist, he used nonviolent methods. Terrorists use fear, intimidation, violence and atrocities. I support no organization that uses such tactics, and thus I feel terrorists are not to be supported.
Quoted for truth.

Everyone, we understand that sometimes governments label freedom fighters as terrorists when they are not. However, we're using the objective terms here, which states that a terrorist was not, say, Ghandi, no matter what the British government thought. We have to cleraly define the terms in order to assess the situation.

I mean, having defined them, I don't see how anyone can see any good in terrorism. What Cloud No. 9 - and all those who support him - is getting at is that there are those who were labeled as terrorists, but were, in actuality, fighting for the right cause - and not using terrorist actions. Ghandi, for example, was not a terrorist - in the real definition of the term.

And to all those who are going (and starting) to bring up the "War on Terror": we all know Mr. Bush is a smurfing idiot in that regard. Thanks.