'Strong' and a good for the country are two different things. Stalin was a 'strong' leader. Ghenghis Khan was a 'strong' leader. Strength means nothing if you exploit and harm your own countymen.Originally Posted by blackline77
Anyway, it's questionable how strong Bush is. He may invade other countries, and ignore all critiscism, but he's not strong. Ghandi was strong. Dr. King was strong. Che Guevara, Kier Hardie, Ho Chi Mihn, they were strong.
Bush, he's just a small-minded aristocrat, controlled by blood-thirsty corporations. Not strong.




