Michael Moore

[XxSephirothxX]

I found some of the facts presented in Farenheit 9/11 really interesting and depressing. It's really difficult to separate the bias from the truth, though. I much preferred Bowling for Columbine--I think it was a far better movie. It was less biased, more entertaining, and far more informative and less speculation.

Did you miss completely miss this?

Michael Moore is just as bad as Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, and all the other conservative nutjobs.

The only liberal nutjob that I like is Al Franken, because he's actually funny.

For those of you who say you find it amusing how the "right-wings blow up" everytime he's mentioned...how about how the liberals blow up everytime Rush Limbaugh or Ann Coulter are mentioned?

They're all idiots.

Yes, Raistlin, I did completely miss it because I don't go around looking for things to completely debase Michael Moore's movies. According to that site, more than what I thought of his movie was made up or skewed, but it's not like I was naive enough to think they were all cold, hard facts. Still, his points about the United States media thriving on fear and effecting the people, Canada having less gun deaths, and so on are still legitimate. So other countries have stricter gun laws. Maybe that's more important than anything else in the movie, and it's not even heavily discussed--why don't we have stricter gun laws? I sure as hell wish we did.
On a side note, I just bought Al Franken's "Lies and the Lying Liars who tell them" and plan on reading it soon.