Wait a sec, I was just humming! I'm not even allowed to do that now? I think your theories are ridiculous, and Unknowns pointed out nearly everything I was going to, so I was happy that I didn't have to do it myself. I didn't even use the words ignorant or insane in that post, jerk.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Your theories were refuted in the eyes of anyone with a brain who recognizes logic, which is enough for me. I doubt anything we could do would get you to change your mind on this stuff.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
If human genetics don't apply then interbreeding between humans and propagators wouldn't be possible, so your theory is wrong. Arguing that the parts which negate your theory are wrong while the parts that support it are correct is total BS. It's either everything or nothing. If genetics don't apply, then genetics never apply.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Actually, it's not. This question doesn't prove anything of the sort. There is no "Sam Hill" mentioned in the game, so it doesn't matter how long you play, it won't be there.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Yes, I dare. In fact, everyone in this thread "dares" to call you insane. That should tell you something. As G SpOtZ says, people who think that they are the only sane people around usually wind up in a psych ward.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
I'd love to beat you on game play, but how exactly are either of us supposed to prove that? Also, what does gameplay have to do with your sanity?Originally Posted by Future Esthar
I never said you are stupid. I said you are "stuck on stupid", because, quite frankly, it's true. Your theories are stupid, but you might be a very intelligent person.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Why not just do it here? The original discussion of this topic is gone, so it's not like it'll hurt anything. And I don't really want to go chase you down among a dozen different threads to understand what you are trying to say.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Huh?Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Actually, it's not. You offer a load of theories indicating a conspiracy behind the entire workings of FFVIII, and then offer no logical explanation as to why your "X" is the only person capable of doing all these things.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Wrong. A legend might not be accurate, but it isn't always incorrect or corrupted. A legend is just a story passed down over generations.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Um, and this is proof how? WTF does the skelector have to do with Hyne? WTF does the frelling chicobo have to do with Hyne? You're grasping at straws here, buddy.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Possibly, but I don't really feel like wasting time trying to find better examples for your theories. I'm spending enough time trying to debunk them.If this is not a good comparison then what it is.
Can you do better?
If it was put there to show the TRUTH, as you claim, then changing it as you have done is distorting the truth: which means it is lies. Well done, you just debunked your own theory.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
You need to understand the difference between "interpretation" and "manipulation".And interpretations are interpretations.They can´t be prooved or refuted.
Good. Call us when you are done.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
And these ideas are related how?Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Yes, "VSS" is a very stupid statement, and doesn't have anything to do with the matter at hand. No offense intended here, but did you get hit in the head with a sledgehammer recently? You cannot simply change a game approved fact with your ridiculous assertation that it was a typo. "Hyne" is not a misspelling, it is an in-game fact, and no matter what you say, nothing changes that. If "Hyne" is wrong, then all the names are wrong, which is what Unknowns was pointing out.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
Science, right.Originally Posted by Future Esthar
First, symmetry is not a scientific principle. If you are referring to "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction", that in no way suggests that Elle's power would have to be two-way. If anything, it would suggest that when she brings someone's consciousness into the past, she has to bring someone else's conciousness into the present. Equal and opposite, see? Travel to the future isn't an equal and opposite reaction (especially not the way you are putting it), it is just another action that will have to be counteracted at some point.
Second, WTF?! Now you're arguing that Ellone is a machine? Doesn't this sound even remotely ridiculous to you?!



Reply With Quote