Ok, here is what I have been trying to say:

The article is writen just fine (gramatically) however, the way the article interpits upon reading, makes it seem as though it is more of an attack (for lack of a better word atm) on religon. It goes as far as to serpratley point out christianity, which is just wrong. No religon should have been singled out unless it was singled out in the study. I havn't seen any reports from the studies, and jusdgine by the context of the article, I am gonna say it's scope was per the article.

The way the article came across, despite its carful (!?) wording, was a little aggressive. That is what completley turned me off. The fact that most people whom read it, does support this. Defensive stances prolly also had an effect on this, along with scoped logic. Mouthy was not meant to mean hurling insults, but rather covering information in too many words, wich should really be done with caution on such delicate matters.

In programming life, there are two ways to see things. The logistical, and semantical. The way things are, and the way the are implied. That is very synominous with my thinking. I tend to think that atheists dwell on the logistical, while religous types dwell on the semantical (as far as morality and other behavioral/traditional teachings go). I tend to fall in the middle, although I have more faith in the Christain religon, as it seems to be sufficiant for me.

Bipper