How do they compare at all?Originally Posted by Squinn
actually a couple of weeks ago the K! compared Bullet for My Vallentine with Iron Maiden, Judas Priest and Black Sabbath and im the one they say is crazy!
How do they compare at all?actually a couple of weeks ago the K! compared Bullet for My Vallentine with Iron Maiden, Judas Priest and Black Sabbath and im the one they say is crazy!
[leeza]Total sig height should not be over 250 pixels, including all text.[/leeza]
Kerrang are incredibly fickle. Anything that is popluar now is as good as the best, as far as they're concerned. Which is of course, terrible blasphemy. Oh well, they'll burn in hell!
I just cant choose which one to put up and its really annoying
I would love to be happy, but unfortunately I'm too busy being awesome and kicking your ass at everything
I've told you BURN IT. Then Pour ACID over the ashes. Then FREEZE it then SHATTER it. Only then may the papers find release from the demons upon it.
What annoys me is their mentioning of certain bands without actually having much interest in them, just as a excuse to fill spaces. Then they mock them when it suits them. (i.e: The Smashing Pumpkins). The magazine totally ignores the contrabution the band made to the scene, and instead focuses on Nirvana who were of a very limited scene and never progressed beyond it. Hell, Mudhoney & Sonic Youth were doing what Nirvana did years before, minus shotgun to face.
"I think you'd make any (nice) woman happy... & I think you really deserve for someone to make you happy too for a change"
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
