Because most science types are VERY arrogant. I mean this in an eye gougingly mean way. Yes, they think if they cannot explain somthing, it cannot exist or it is simply too complex. If somthing does not present itself in the form of a scienctific text, or a logistacal theorom then it must not be explainable, and there for does not exist. This is why I have hated about 90% of science nerds I have met. From my experiences, the are so high on themselves and having to know every little thing that makes the universe tick that it gets sickening. While I don't mind people gaining as much knowlage possable, I do mind arrogance.Originally Posted by ?????
/sigh. Science still has not disprovent the Bible, nor does it have much of a leg to stand on. Its a guessing game that entails looking at the small facts that we know, to wonder how the world came about. Like I always say, with enough knowlage, I think that Science and the Bible will have more in common than most science types would like to admit.
Off from this, who says that God even has to exist with in our scope of existance. It could be just as possible that he is a being outside our laws of science. After all, the clear idea of Creationism is that the universe was created. These rules were all made, and made for a reason. We could be comparable to a program written on a computer. The program may be instructed to follow certain rules, that the programmer does not neccesarily have to follow. /shrug If this is how it is, science may never find the proof it seeks.
Bipper
