Originally Posted by
?????
Um, because evolution has a bunch of support for it? You just don't get it. Seriously, you have just about the worst understanding of evolutionary theory, and the definition of "theory" in general, that I've ever heard of, but what's more, you have to go and try to add an air of intellectual legitimacy to your thoughts. There aren't any gaps in the theory. There are gaps in the evidence because (zomg!) there are still fossils left to be dug up. Like I said, if you've got a better, natural theory, let's hear it.
Actually, I've studied Evolutionism for six or eight years now. And whereas I've debated my side since the topic came up in this thread, you came in the other day and have presented absolute dick, then have the gall to hurl insults towards me. By the way, this might help you.
Originally Posted by
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
the·o·ry ( P ) Pronunciation Key (th-r, thîr)
n. pl. the·o·ries
1. A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
2. The branch of a science or art consisting of its explanatory statements, accepted principles, and methods of analysis, as opposed to practice: a fine musician who had never studied theory.
...
6. An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture.
Tested: No. Obviously, can't test Evolutionism.
Widely accepted: Somewhat. Most Americans believe that some form of Higher Power had something to do with our creation, and highly doubt Evolutionism.
I hope I don't have to explain
assumption,
limited information or knowledge, or
conjecture.
Looks like you've got some researching to do. Come back when you have something to add to the debate instead of insults, after you figure out what "Evolution" and "theory" mean.
