FF8 Trivia.

[Skyblade]

I inly remember what I consider important.
They were smart questions.
Their dificulty just proofs this.

Skyblade,you are being arrogant.
Squaresoft deceived you well into thinking it was just an euphemism.
They made on purpose.
Is this way they hide their secrets.
Think about this:
They thought about that euphemism and decided to call the village Winhill.
This way they smartly hide the secret.
But being the arrogant you are you made a precipitate judgement.

Idiot.

Quoted for truth.

[Future Esthar]

And you are arrogant if you think you are the owner of thruth and think that Sam hill was just an euphemism and nothing is hidden on it.
If you think you are right provide proof.

And no,Angelo is not a shumi.

I had myself reasons to say that thing about shumis.I posted some of them here.

[Skyblade]

And you are arrogant if you think you are the owner of thruth and think that Sam hill was just an euphemism and nothing is hidden on it.
If you think you are right provide proof.

http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-sam1.htm

http://www.livinggoldpress.com/samhill.htm

http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_b...sages/302.html

The first three matches for the phrase "what in Sam hill" on Google. There's all the proof I need.

Show me your proof that a common phrase is in reality a cover story for a name change to Winhill in the future, you frelling idiot.

[Future Esthar]

Skyblade,I believe that it is an euphemism.
What I asked was proof to say that Square didn´t intend it to spot a secret.

[Skyblade]

Skyblade,I believe that it is an euphemism.
What I asked was proof to say that Square didn´t intend it to spot a secret.

And I'd like some proof, even an explanation supported by common sense, that they did intend it as a secret. My God, how frelling drugged are you?! You really think that Square would use a common phrase said by a single person in the game as evidence of a name change in the future that can only be explained by time traveling that is never even hinted at?! Don't be stupid.

[Future Esthar]

When they made the game they thought that many people would find the secret story of FF8.
But that didn´t happen.

Separate question:
Are there any Japanese forums on FF8 being able to be spot by Google? It seems Google has problems with Japanese characters.

[Skyblade]

When they made the game they thought that many people would find the secret story of FF8.
But that didn´t happen.

Or, y'know, it's just a total crackpot theory which isn't really supported by any ingame evidence and that Square never intended. Quite frankly, I doubt Square believed that anyone had misinterpreted their storyline as stupidly as you have.

But, you know what? I give up. Believe what you want. But for the love of God, stop creating 50 different threads to argue your points. Put all of your stuff in one thread. You recently created a new thread: Put everything pertaining to your theories in there. Do you realize that you have at least 6 threads all about your theories? Stop making new ones, or I will make a petition to get you banned (creating tons of pointless topics about the same thing is called spam, and you can be banned for it).

[G SpOtZ]

this is insane. FE is insane. FE seriously, you will not accept the fact you're straight up WRONG. and you've been PROVED WRONG SEVERAL TIMES. seriously and undoubtedly. you're theories are NOTHING, they are FALSE.

and that's a fact. you're done.

[GunbladeMaster]

u dont have the rite to say that. no body does except Square cas theyre the only primary source that we have

[Skyblade]

u dont have the rite to say that. no body does except Square cas theyre the only primary source that we have

Square did say that. Square wrote the game's script, which disagrees with Future Esthar's theories at basically every point.

[Future Esthar]

PROOVED WRONG? WERE?

I can made new threads as long as I take some time to do it.

[Leeza]

When they made the game they thought that many people would find the secret story of FF8.
But that didn´t happen.

Or, y'know, it's just a total crackpot theory which isn't really supported by any ingame evidence and that Square never intended. Quite frankly, I doubt Square believed that anyone had misinterpreted their storyline as stupidly as you have.

But, you know what? I give up. Believe what you want. But for the love of God, stop creating 50 different threads to argue your points. Put all of your stuff in one thread. You recently created a new thread: Put everything pertaining to your theories in there. Do you realize that you have at least 6 threads all about your theories? Stop making new ones, or I will make a petition to get you banned (creating tons of pointless topics about the same thing is called spam, and you can be banned for it).

Skyblade: I really am boggled as to why you would come in here if it really bothers you so much. It is quite simple to just not click on any of FEs threads. No one is twisting yours or anyone elses arm to do so.

If the only purpose is to come in here and flame FE for his theories, then please just stay out of his threads. This applies to everyone.

[TasteyPies]

The thing about theories is that they are meant to be an interesting idea with potential. Theories are to be evaluated and either proven right, or discarded. If you cannot prove the theory, set it down, admit your mistake, and start thinking about something else.

@ FE: Your combination of far-fetched ideas, and horrible grammar do not bring enlightened discussion to this board. However, it does bring allot of entertainment. I at least enjoy reading your threads.

[Future Esthar]

I call them theories but they are not.
But if you wanna I will not call them that.

[G SpOtZ]

why do you call them theories if they aren't?