Quote Originally Posted by lordblazer
Is because Evolutionist have a problem with creationist and thinkt hey are weird udmband wrong and they want evolution to be alone, yet evolution like creationism. LAcks the evidence it needs.
No it doesn't. Evolutionism stands up perfectly well alone - as does Creationism. However, we have evidence of evolution, even if there are missing links, and there are some things which are just smurfing weird (Platypus, anyone?). Evolution is also logically consistent. In short: Mutations occur. Some mutations are beneficial. These beneficial mutations allow that individual to do better than its counterparts, and so over time the descendants of that mutant become the dominant form of the species. Enough mutations and you have a new species.

It is of course possible to suggest that God created life originally, as well as set in motion evolution, or even that He's in the business of directing it.

Now actually both groups and arguements are just ridiculious and make no sense when they are alone, but make them coexist and they will actually make more sense.
I find most evolutionary theory to be very sensible and consistent. If it wasn't for evidence to the contrary, the idea of spontaneous intelligent design (Ie creating everything fully-formed.) would be a perfectly valid supposition.

Also how people read Genisis.
they think its dumbt hat the earth was created in 7 days,

Well it is dumb. If you read that literally.

1 day to god may be a thousand hell even a few billion or million years.
Then why say 'day'? A 'day' exists only a concept of a single rotation on a planet's axis. Thus, if God created the Earth in 7 Jovian days, that's only going to be something like 50 hours. 7 Venusunian days, on the other hand, would have taken years to pass. Keeping in mind that God's a pretty smart fellow (Being, you know, omnipotent and the source of the entire universe and all.), I doubt he'd leave this room for ambiguity. If he wrote the Bible. Which he didn't. Rendering any and all 'evidence' it gives us entirely moot.

Why do we attack christainity is this some sort of fad. Crap go attack Buddhism.
I often attack Buddhism. I find the idea of denying pretty much everything about us which makes us Human to be ridiculous; almost a defilement of whatever created us and whatever we are. However, Christianity is the religion with real power in the English-speaking nations of the world. We're more likely to hear a Christian talking about an issue than a Hindu. There's also quite a lot of Christians in America and Europe; they're obvious targets and their philosophy is known to pretty much every layperson there is (Whether accurately known or not is another matter, but given the many different denominations learning them all is difficult anyway.).