Basically, post-modernism could be considered as a crisis of values, the transcendental ideas are being set apart by new values which could be considered superficial. In front of this problem, some still hold to the values of modernism, in an attempt to resurrect the transcendental values. On the other hand, many others hold to what I call “occasion philosophies”, theories I happen to find pretty superficial and not satisfying at all, many of them obviously sustained by those who defend the current culture. On this postmodern philosophies, I could find examples like some branches of anglosaxon pragmatic philosophies, or pseudo-religious new age taken under superficial ideas, I am sure anyone who has read Paulo Cohelo knows what I am talking about. I do not wish to close it here, as I believe there is one large branch I want to consider in this post. After the death of God Nietzsche predicted, we face nihilism. Nihilism comes from latin “nihil”, meaning “nothing”. The nihilist, seeing the death of all transcendental values, the decadence of metaphysics, simply puts asides any beliefs and falls into a total political skepticism, he does not believe in trascendence seeing it dead, he doesn’t believe in the cheap philosophies that last for ten years if lucky. It’s not being apathetic, it’s more like being hopeless.
I think this may be the first thing you've said that I agree with.

Yet, through this past year I have been able to read from other ideas, which have awakened me from the dream of reason. I don’t want to go much into this, as it will come off as excessively pedantic, and I hope you can forgive me, but I believe this names are to be taken into account if you have never read them. First came Charles Baudelaire, and then it was when I read a branch of philosophy that had always tempted me, but I had never got into: Goethe, Hölderlin, Shelling, Nietzsche, Baruch Spinoza, Herman Hesse…one would say, the romantics (or neoromantics and pre-romantics, cause Nietzsche, Spinoza and Hesse are not romantic). Here I found what had been lacking in the Enlightenment, this is, the great transcendental idea of Beauty, rescued at last from Plato, the greatest of all thinkers. And as reason is doubted, one abandons modernism.
Now you ruined it.

You are right in the first part - the general analysis - but wrong in your conclusions, because of a fault in your premises. Modernism (especially post-modernism, from what I've read) is the antithesis of the Enlightenment and of reason.

EDIT: Couldn't resist:

And here I close my part in this post. There are the ones who still believe, that fight on and on in what seems Sysiphus at work. Not because fight never gives result, it does work, but in front of the great monster of postmodernism, the hungry beast of capitalism, war passing by like a million of grey dogs, is there really any hope?
Post-modernist philosophy is also contradictory to capitalist philosophy.

Once reason is doubted, you do believe everything is yet to be done, but it seems nothing is possible. Nothing but nothingness.
This is true. Once reason's doubted, nothing is possible except suffering and delusion.