Quote Originally Posted by Dreddz
I always thought Terrorism was Saddam related. When America went after him, they took Britain with them. Then london was attacked. London was attacked for helping America capture Saddam. So it was related....
I don't know WHO told you what, but no one with any political voice ever seriously supported the theory that Saddam was directly involved in any major terrorist activities. Besides the standard "don't ask, don't tell" policy of letting terrorists hide within Iraq's borders. No, Saddam was much too busy blasting the hell out of his own people to bother with anyone else.

Besides, it shouldn't have been a matter of "taking" anyone with us. Saddam was already openly and blatently violating the ceasefire agreements that saved his hairy little ass last time. Reason enough to resume our old actions. Last time we let countries slide on something like that, it started WW2. Prudence should demand we never give ANY country the illusion that they might be able to get away with the stuff we let Germany slide on.