i. No game is truly good or bad. It is nothing more than the opinion of a single person. In addition, everyone has their own opinion on what makes a game good or bad. Rather than trying to argue that a game is good, just accept that everyone has their own opinion and move on with your life.

ii. To anyone who still wishes to prove a game good or bad: Here’s what you do to prove this part of the document false. You take a poll of every person in the world on one video game. Every person must play the game and then tell you if they like it or not. If every person answers the poll the same way, then you have proven that there really is such a thing as a good or bad video game. Then of course, everytime a baby is born your poll is no longer accurate.
This is dealing with absolutism, and absolutism is a very frail argument for anything. There is a deep, inherent fallacy in saying that no game is good or bad simply because somebody SOMEWHERE might enjoy it. There is and will always be a natural arc of quality that can be agreed upon.

You are more than welcome to hide behind the defense of opinion, but I can present facts that can back up a statement.

Let's examine a hypothetical game. This game has a lot of spelling and grammatical mistakes, and the story line is absolutely nonexistent. I can say with some certainty, due to my expertise in the field of writing, that the game is poor in the areas of storyline, grammar, and spelling. You can attempt to refute it, but your argument is moot because you are fighting a losing battle. No matter how much you try to refute it, you WILL be wrong because the game IS what it is.

By this token, while there is a great deal of gray area in judging a game, there is still a certain level of quality that can be agreed upon as fact. People might dislike a game for any different reason, but just about every gamer can see the inherent flaws in any given game just as well as they can see the good points.

There is such a thing as a bad game. They do exist, I've played them, and I can say with some certainty that the game is, in fact, bad. Someone can refute it to their heart's content, but unless they can present factual evidence to debunk my extensive lists of reasons why the game itself is bad (which they would not be able to do due to the inherent lack of quality in the game itself).