Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 50 of 50

Thread: Is "Brother" Into Incest?

  1. #46
    cyka blyat escobert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Rush B! NO STOP!
    Posts
    17,742
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    [leeza]*snip*

    Not funny, Bert. ~ Leeza[/leeza]

  2. #47
    A Big Deal? Recognized Member Big D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    8,370
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Actually... breeding between first cousins is fairly harmless - the birth-defect rate is about the same as for unrelated parents. In western countries, it's something of a well-entrenched urban myth that first-cousin marriages result in deformed children. This is mainly due to the royal family that was almost entirely composed of haemophiliacs.
    This kind of thing is also a big factor in these relationships being regarded as taboo in most western cultures (incidentally, it's illegal in 30 US states). In many parts of Asia, however, it's fairly common - and has no ill effects on the children.

  3. #48

  4. #49
    Draw the Drapes Recognized Member rubah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Now Destiny is done.
    Posts
    30,655
    Blog Entries
    21
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mj05
    That is exactly what I'm saying. I have 6 sisters and 4 brother, only 3 of which are actually blood related. There is a reason that incest is illegal in most states. Step-sibling or not; just the thought of it makes me want to cringe. I didnt have a "crush" when I was little. I was a tom-boy and was tougher than the boys. Some kid across the street kissed me on the cheek when I was 8 and I decked him in the face. Enough said?
    I said I wanted to marry my first-cousin when i was like four and barely knew what marriage was, much less why marrying a cousin would be wrong.

    I don't think I even wanted to, I just said that the way little kids do xD

  5. #50
    What You Say? Recognized Member BG-57's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Your Base
    Posts
    6,423
    Contributions
    • Notable contributions to Final Fantasy forums

    Default

    A lot hinges on the founder effect, where the first generation's traits are preserved in a highly inbred line. If the founder's traits are beneficial, inbreeding is advantageous, but if it isn't (like with Hemophillia), it does more harm than good.

    But the lack of genetic diversity can be dangerous in the long run if the environment drastically alters and formerly beneficial traits could become a liability. A highly inbred population cannot adapt very well to changes and are all vunerable to the same things (I remember reading that 25% of pure-bred Dalmations are born deaf).

    Of course, this is with highly inbred populations. Out-breeding every couple of generations can prevent most of this from happening.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •