You're wrong. Nazi's are exclusive to anti-semitism and racism and sexism. I am not a Nazi. Supremecy was a nazi idealogy, but it's also found in Tyrannies. I'm not suggesting a tyranny, I'm suggesting a society that values these aspects. Genocide is the mass and organized extinction of a people based on race or ethnicity. I'm doing it because they are simply unfit. It's a favor for Earth.You qualify as a Nazi just so you know. You seem to believe in genocide and you believe in supremacy, which i believe is sick and disturbing.
I have known many drug addicts within my own family, and they can't be helped. We've tried. Not everyone can be helped, furthermore, not everyone wants help. If they are going to be worthless to society, they are worthless as people,Why are they unfit? Why cant they better themself's if their drug addict's or prostitutes? Dont kill them help them. Why is it so nessasary to kill them?
I'm a moderate and lean to the left.Everyone who's extreme right winged is.
You are confusing what elitism is. Elitism is a grouping and caste system where the strongest in power are at the top. Homosexuals can hold power. This isn't elitism in the sense of the procreation of race, but rather the benefit of the society. There are plenty of heterosexuals to ensure the procreation of race, such that an elitist society would not need to harm homosexuals. Homosexuals can be part of the elites. You can't look to history for elitism, because that was more fascism and racism. I'm talking pure elitism. Those who are fit to be at the top will be. Those who can lead and gather power, they will be at the top.According to history almost every elitist society does. Unless the "elites" are homosexuals themselfs you will be oppressed and dehumanized.
No, you're descibing tyrannical oppression. Elitism is all about those who can reach power and keep it. It's not about ethnicity, sex, or social class. They may hinder you, but they don't keep you down, you can always advance, despite these things, you just may have to work harder, and rightfully so. If you weren't granted the appropriate traits, then you should have to work harder anyways.No... they favor those who qualify as elite. In a elitist society it would require the right ethnic background, sex , social class or religious belief's to climb the ladder, if you dont fit the profile of any of those things no matter how much you can "work the system" you will be oppressed. What you describe is not elitism.
Iran is a tyranny, not an elitism. You're skewing what elitism is and I believe I've deftly made it clear. Iran is tyrannical and fascist. Elites can be any gender, and race, any religion or sexuality. It all depends on who is in power. And even those in power can be manipulated by those who are not seen as elites by them until they grant enough recognition and support to where they actually join in or completely overthrow the elites.A elitist society is tyranny and oppression, in Iran a male, arabic born muslim are the elite's in their society. Unless you are not a male who is muslim from birth you are considered below them. That is elitist, if you dont believe me check the definition.
What's wrong with that idea? It's their opinion, and if I could sway them, then I would earn a spot as an elite. If not, then I'd merely go and find a different loop hole, assuming he's an elite. Then again, that would also just be a display of ignorance. Homosexuals are perfectly capable human beings. People born with mental retardation or mental illness are not. They have severe limitations.Just so you know your sig and this debate is NOT FUNNY. Would you of like it if some homophobe made a topic about how much "Homosexuals should die"?
that's called a theocracy or a tyranny, once again. Elitism supports those capable of surviving. The alpha human vs. the beta and the gammas and the omegas. Like in Brave New World. I just don't think people should be engineered as such. Human perseverence can allow them to overcome themselves and jump the caste level they are in.Thats what always happens in a elitist society. If it's a religion then you are forced to follow that religion or your killed, if it's racial supremacy then the members of the "inferior" race would be killed or would have very little rights.
I believe it because it is a benefit to society. We waste million helping the mentally disabled or ill, and why? I have no connection to them, I would like to keep that money in my pocket. There's no reason that I should pay for their welfare. If they can't support themselves, they are unfit for life here on this Earth.What morals? You believe in killing people because of who they are, or because of their position. You are a very sick person if you consider that moral.
Western Society pretends to care too much about others, rather then themeselves and those who they are close with. Facades are just no fun.You already have that in Western Society.
I do notice, and I said that I was glad it has cut down. Not so much for education, but for the social welfare system, I am all for its disposal. Instead of helping people who are sick or unable to help themselves, we should help those who are perfectly able to get the education needed in order to advance and become better members of society. I'm all for college scholarships because it requires someone to take initiative to apply for it and to work for it to achieve it. It requires them to work through highschool.You dont notice much do you? Social welfare doesnt helped that much, Bush's Administration cut down on college scholarships by over 25 billion and 10 billion in Social welfare to increase military budgets. In reality it has never helped just look at the Katrina victims.
It's not capitalism's fault that these people don't have jobs. They don't have jobs because they haven't searched well enough. Also, there are an abundance of the poor and they should fight for jobs because it weens out who should and should not have jobs. If you want a job, you can find one if you're desperate enough. Crime doesn't come because of capitalism, it comes from desperation and weakness to keep yourself in line with the code society presents. Drugs aren't because people can't find jobs, drugs are because people are weak.Actually its capitalism that causes the crime's. People cant find job's so they resort to crime.
A people can only help themselves if they go for a revolution. The people in Iraq should have staged a revolution before we got involved.What do you expect? They dont want a revolution, so they do something to prevent a revolution.
Isn't that how it should be. Why should we help people if they aren't trying.It pretty much doesnt exist since not alot of people have it. And in the US for you to get Social Welfare you need to be holding a job.
Also, about TANF. You have five years max you are allowed to be on it. You can only be unemployed for two years, if any longer, they take your help away. So you have two years to find a job while on TANF. I think that is MORE THAN ENOUGH TIME.
Rightfully so and these are steps in the right direction.That is already going on in the US, if you havent noticed you guys have a poverty problem. 17% of Americans live under the poverty level and they recieve no social welfare. So what are you complaning about?
This is just for the humorous purpose of the screen name.It's funny how you made that post and the poor are "unfit" yet, you call yourself 'Dignified Pauper'
