I'm missing the point. Are you saying that the game should be treated seperately from what outside information Square gives us?
I'm missing the point. Are you saying that the game should be treated seperately from what outside information Square gives us?
Eh...not really. I don't really pay attention to info outside of the actual game, because it's not all that important to focus on a video game you know? That's just me.Originally Posted by Sir Bahamut
Psh. I will be seeing you outside. :D :pOriginally Posted by Sir Bahamut
It all boils down to one thing really. In the final battle against ultimecia, if ultimecia was to kill Rinoa (as in my first attempt) she would have killed the past version of herself and destroyed her own existence in the process. Rinoa does have Squalls ring but it could have gotten to Ultimecia by a number of different ways. The most obvious being maybe Ultimecia is Rinoas great great great grandaughter or some [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img].
Wait.. It's been awhile since I played FF8, but I don't recall Ultimecia having Squall's ring.
Formerly: Autumn Rain
While R=U as a theory doesn't work, this actually isn't a strike against it. Time Compression (even though never fully completed) isn't subject to a concept like the grandfather paradox (or, here, something similar), because Time Compression doesn't necessarily follow the same rules as "normal time travel." Time Compression, as suggested in-game, involves compressing various states of present, and while the Magic is in effect, these states of present can "coexist" without creating causality and continuity paradoxes. Essentially, each "present" now exists without being dependent upon its own past; in overlapping, they are independent of one another for their own continuity.Originally Posted by shinangel2292
Basically, as I see it, the states of present exist independent of each other for the purposes of Time Compression. Changing the past wouldn't alter the future, because these are meaningless categorizations within the framework of Time Compression. All time is one.
In any case, as already shown, Ultimecia created Griever by Drawing the parameters for the GF from Squall's mind ("Your feelings, I shall summon the most powerful of things [from them]!").
There's no evidence that she does. It's simply an assumption one is forced to make if one chooses to ignore Griever's having been created during the battle.Originally Posted by Autumn Rain
Last edited by Masamune·1600; 11-22-2005 at 02:28 AM.
That's what I thought. I've seen the R=U dribble on forums over and over again, but that was the first time anyone used Ultimecia having Squall's ring as proof.Originally Posted by Masamune∙1600
Formerly: Autumn Rain
Unlike everyone else, I like the idea of Rinoa being Ultimecia. It's such a cool twist. Wish it was true...but thats just my opinion.
I like this idea more...
Originally Posted by Big D
aLL THOUGH THIS IS PROBABLY JUST A JOKE THE THERORY IS TRUEOriginally Posted by Unknowns
It;s the same wolrd and i;s Time movement relaed (Not compression)
R=U is a nice theory and it wouldve been nice if Square went somewhere with it and actually gave Ultimecia a storyline. Squares confirmed its not true though.
but when u think about it, it does fit!!Originally Posted by Shiny_Griever
![]()
![]()
hopefully this thread should end all of those stupid theories about rinoa and ultimecia.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr3x_RRJdd4
...*holds up free hugs sign.*