I see good points and bad for all 3 systems. it's just a matter of which system is best for you. Ive been playing video games for 30 years now(pong was my first and I cant believe i spent hours on it :rolleyes2 ) and one thing I know is that there is no one system that is better than everyone else. So, i'm just gonna play Oblivion on my 360, whatever Rockstar makes for the PS3, and zelda on the revolution. It's like saying which car is better, automatic or stick shift.
The PS3 only has one good game for it so far. MGS4, everything else is either all flash and no substance... or a racing game.
Seeing as itll be a year before its released its doing pretty well so far.Originally Posted by Darth Holmes
How many Xbox 360 games have "substance"?
Even by your standards one game with substance on a system that hasn't even come out yet is better than none on one already out.
Funny typo btw. :rolleyes2
I plan on waiting for the Playstation3. I saw the hype for XBOX 360. I watch MTV quite frequently and their programs have been delicately destroyed with XBOX ads now. Not to mention an entire week dedicated to gaming on their show. And celebrities with fake smiles promoting the product they truely don't enjoy.
I've always been a Sony person myself but one Christmas I decided to get an XBOX. Rather late I'd say but just in time for Halo II. I was disappointed. The graphics are good but I just found nothing interesting about paying tons of money for useless add-on's. Ever since then I've stopped buying things for it altogether. It just sits in my closet tucked away in it's little box.
I'll be happy when the PS3 delivers. I'm disappointed Bill Gates made a pathetic attempt to make a system. Backed by a sh*t faced space shooter as it's legacy.
Joel, joel, joel.....Joel. What can I say?? Let's see. Tekken 6, Final Fantasy VII: Tech Demo, Final Fantasy XIII, and many other games will be impressive in the PS3 generation...
What's even funnier is that I wrote it like that on purpose because I didn't know how to spell it. So it isn't a typo at all... =D
Tekken= OLD
New Final Fantasy= *yawn*
FF7 Tech demo=... tech demo
There has GOT to be something new and innovative other than something that's just a freaking flashy show.
Joel, what's so new and innovative about some of the the Xbox 360's games? Since, you know, it's not a year away from its release date.
i like how people quote one little part of my comment but not the whole message. we know nintendo is a japaneese company. Which is why stupid japano reaks always like sony and nintendo over microsoft.
Anyway Yu yevon man you are way off.. Since when did Japan have a larger population than USA? LEave it to Canada...Canada sucks!!! lol jking jking.
but Japan does have a larger population than Canada lol.
Let's see, small fry. Free live built in, reattachable harddrives, wireless controllers (yes, 360 got that before the PS3) a controller that DOESN'T look like Picasso threw up all over it, built in High Definition, 12.1 (I think, don't quote me on that number) dolby, and games that PLAY good (except for some exceptions).
yeah once oyu play ?Halo 2 you played all the games xbox has o offer right? Halo 2 aint [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] to tell you the truth and it isn't even the best FPS game released for the xbox.
Do you even know who Picasso is? Long end points (GASP!) is more of a bad sculpture than a bad painting.
PS2 had a removable harddrive, and free online games.
A memory card is not a harddrive.
And yes, I freaking know who Picasso is, look at the PS3 controller. While curvey looking it's aweful looking.
EDIT: Actually, the 360 might actually have something to put a nail in its own coffin. Rememberh ow the Sega Saturn failed because it had two processors so developers didn;'t bother making many games for it because it was hard to make games with it's processors. The 360 has 3. Plus I think the PS3 has multiple processors. I suppose Nintendo gets my money now.
Last edited by Erdrick Holmes; 11-25-2005 at 05:01 AM.
but most of the software developing companies develop PC games so it shouldn't be a problem for them to develop games for the xbox 360 if they can make a PC game that is always over demanding in hardware upgrades.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote