Ok, 8 pages and yet no one has given a decent reason as to why there should be an FFX-3. So far, the main reasons people seem to want it is:

A) They think it might make up for the critical failure that was FFX-2.

B) They want to see yet another game set in Spira (pretty much just for nostalgia)

C) They want to see the Zanarkand/Bevelle War or Braska’s Pilgrimage as the centre of the game.

None of these are good reasons, and none are going to convince Square-Enix that FFX-3 is worth the trouble.

‘A’ is fine in theory, but then you would have to think up a new plot which would be even more pathetic than that in FFX-2 due to having even less to elaborate upon.

Anyone who fails into category ‘B’ simply needs to suck it up and play new, original games rather than crappy 12 year old games that really aren’t as awes…wait, wrong game. Same thing without the words ‘crappy’ and ‘12 years old’ in it.

‘C’ supporters need to learn the definition of ‘back story’, and also need to start actually looking for depth within the original games rather than playing new games that practically spoon feed the intricacies of the original plot to them.

Ultimately, FFX-3 would only be justified if there was some sort of plot hole within either FFX or FFX-2 significant enough for it to require further elaboration. I can’t think of any, and it would seem no one else here can either, so let’s end this whole ‘ffx-3 bez good stuf dun spol it fo ffx-2 fanz/ No it wouldn’t, and speak English you smurftard’ debate here.