Originally Posted by ZeZipster
Brilliant solution.
Boris, you win the competition!
back to the matter at hand.
Chris, no one backstabbed you, we merely debunked your statistic and the statement that you regarded as "FACT". You've no right to get angry and say that you thought EoFF was a better place than this. Perhaps if you did a little more research and focused yourself into coherent discussion, then perhaps you'd be a little more self-aware of what you're saying. The FACTS are that your statistic proves nothing and your statement can't be considered fact without legitimate evidence. One statistic is not legitimate - especially when there is no background of the study's history.
