You don't totally believe the game? Oh! Well, that's good! How can you have a theory about something in something if none of the facts of this something actually apply. Example:Originally Posted by Future Esthar
I don't believe that my dog can speak Latin.
My dog barks.
I'm pondering about whether she said "Food" or "Walk" on Latin.
What proof is more serious than something that has been clearly stated? If you do not accept the ideas of the makers, as proven by Christmas and yourself already (see some post on INFORMATION section of the game, that is apparently a lie:rolleyes2 ), how can you argue about their true intentions?