The other possessed shumis.

[Noj_R]

there is no explaination, maybe square didn't really care to specify that. how about we drop it?

Sounds good to me, this is a no win situation.

[Future Esthar]

The best opportunity I even had to show that Odine possessed the monsters to hunt for Elle on Winhill.

[Noj_R]

The best opportunity I even had to show that Odine possessed the monsters to hunt for Elle on Winhill.

Dont worry, youll think of something else...:rolleyes2

Good night.

Ill shall return tomorrow...Count on it...

[Heero Yuy NWZC]

I won't be on until tomorrow night, but i'll be here(probably very late tough. if u guys are already gone i'll just put in my views at the end).

[Future Esthar]

I will not be here today night probably and on the next few days.
Had to finish FF8.

[Christmas]

I will not be here today night probably and on the next few days.
Had to finish FF8.

Yes. You really should.

[Discord]

I will not be here today night probably and on the next few days.
Had to finish FF8.

Good idea. Maybe you'll be able to enlighten us after you do.

[dante the demon prince]

what did i miss

[Discord]

what did i miss

A lot of good news. FE decided to finish FF8 now!

[dante the demon prince]

A lot of good news. FE decided to finish FF8 now!

dude fe is weird if he aint done yet like me i need new copy and i aint finished game yet so

[Foetus In Fetu]

If a theory had proof it wouldn't be a theory

What I'm about to say isn't directly on-topic, but I think it could do with being said. There is a huge disparity between what the general public believes to be a theory and what a theory actually is, in the scientific sense. A theory is an explanation of phenomena with a substantial amount of evidence; scientifically, there is no such thing as 'proof', but when an hypothesis has reached the point where it has more evidence supporting it than any competing hypothesis (i.e., when it is the most accurate and stream-lined explanation for the set of phenomena given) then it becomes a theory. A theory is actually an elevated status equal to scientific law (equal, but different in nature: a law is a statement, a theory is an explanation).

Future Esthar's conjecture doesn't qualify as a theory. It qualifies at best as an hypothesis, but there is no in-game evidence to support it and it's completely superfluous to the story. The most evident and stream-lined explanation for any "Hey, how did Deling get a monster to pretend to be him?" or "Why were there monsters in the Balamb basement?", etc., is: the plot is weak at this point (because we're still talking about a game, not real life, let's draw a distinction) and/or there needed to be a boss, or monsters, at this point in the game. That's it. Future Esthar is of course entitled to believe whatever the hell he likes, but it's not canon at all.

[chronic_Maniac]

FE you pass the square Enix test as the best FF8 player ever!!! We will be coming to your home to take you to the world FF8 was inspired in, yes you will be god of it. All of us has been testing you..... your whole life....... for this moment...... Wake up!!

I want you to make a post saying this theroy is true. Come on now. We all know you can do it.

[Future Esthar]

Are you kidding?

[Christmas]

There were two garden dropouts at one entrance.But they remain on the same place and since there are two entrances monsters would make their way on the other.

EVER HEARD OF SOMETHING CALLED PATROLLING???? THEY STAYED AT THE SAME SPOT 24 HOURS 7 DAYS A WEEK? DID YOU SEE WHAT LAGUNA DID WHEN HE IS IN WINHILL?

As long as there is someone that can defend the town, it doesn't really matters where that someone is. If the monster enter the town, the folks will just alarm that someone and the monster can be easily deal with.

[Future Esthar]

That´s really strange.
Laguna and Kiros keeps patrolling the town always moving and there are monsters everywhere.
These dropouts stay stopped awhile and there were no monsters?
This kinda resembles the strange boulder explosive phenomena on the excavation dream.