Who is stronger?

**Stroo** · 03-10-2006, 05:14 PM

i dont get it

**Future Esthar** · 03-10-2006, 06:08 PM

No,they don´t prove theirs.

**Ryushikaze** · 03-10-2006, 06:44 PM

Nor, child, did you prove yours. Yours, however, require a great deal more hoops to be jumped through.

As such, they are not parsimonious and as such are disfavored.
You've still got the grand deceiver disadvantage.

And actually, for the most part, your opponents are asserting a negative. You, as the one fronting the positive claim, MUST SUPPORT YOUR THEORY, OR ELSE IT FAILS BY DEFAULT, whether or not people contest it with another theory.

"That apple is blue." "No, it's red." "No, it's blue, but you've been made to only SEE it as red."

**Future Esthar** · 03-10-2006, 08:59 PM

What is a parsimonium?

**Ramza Beoulve** · 03-10-2006, 09:13 PM

What is a parsimonium?

parsimonious.- "excessively unwilling to spend"

**nik0tine** · 03-10-2006, 10:03 PM

What the... the smurf?

**Future Esthar** · 03-11-2006, 01:46 PM

Explain me that in the context please.

**Zanius** · 03-11-2006, 02:04 PM

And don't forget that Adel was caught at the time she started to gather Rinoa's energy, it also means that she wasn't fully recovered. But even that Adel absorbed all Rinoa’s energy; she could not have her full strength, because the big part of her powers was yet at the Memorial.

**Mo-Nercy** · 03-11-2006, 02:14 PM

Originally Posted by Future Esthar

The fallacy is yours.
It is not implied on the game that Adel´s powers came from Ulti or were less.

How does that justify the existance of ALL your theories then? Where in the game does it that Cid = Quistis or whatever the hell your latest crackpot, "I have to much time on my hands" assumption is?

Originally Posted by Future Esthar

No,until they prove their assertions and disprove mines we are at a draw.

We just KNOW that you're an idiot so we don't bother arguing back. :rolleyes2

**Future Esthar** · 03-11-2006, 02:32 PM

There is a word for that:ARROGANCE.
(Sorry for the flame mods but they flamed me first).

**Zanius** · 03-11-2006, 02:53 PM

Look Mo-Nercy, no one is forcing you to come in here and start to insult the other members. If you have something to say without any offensive words, then you can say it. Independent of the opinion divergences, people should be respected.

**Mirage** · 03-11-2006, 03:04 PM

The problem is that FE never understand when he has lost.

**Future Esthar** · 03-11-2006, 04:48 PM

No,no one showed ANY of my theories to be false.At least up to today.
If it happens I would myself admit that it was wrong and procede to other theories anulating that one.
I am humble enough to do that.

**Ryushikaze** · 03-11-2006, 06:53 PM

FE, remember, we never have to. You have to prove your theories correct under the burden of proof. Since you can never present sufficient evidence, your theories fail.

**sephirothkevbob** · 03-11-2006, 07:59 PM

i have read some of FE's theorys and most of them made sense now im not going to take sides in this argument but i am just saying that i can see FE's point and i can also see how people dont support it.

and for all the people out there that were confused or didnt understand how adel is stronger than omega i will explain it how i understood it but this might be wrong.

our heroes are stronger than omega, thats why omega gets defeated by you (obviously)
adel is a fusion of all the main heroes (squall, zell, rinoa, etc.). so if only 3 of the main heroes (your party for omega) had the strength to defeat omega then because adel is all 8 (i think it was 8) she would be twice and a bit as powerful as the team that beat omega, and because that team of 3 beat omega, adel (all 8) is stronger.

i think thats it, i dunno if i got it correct and i dunno if thats actually more complicated that Future's explanation, i dunno.

View Poll Results: Who is stronger?

Thread: Who is stronger?

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions