Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 36

Thread: PS3 pushed back to 2007 for the US?

  1. #16
    Lumberjack Recognized Member RSL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    7,225
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    No, the whole thread. NO ONE with any idea what's going on thinks it's going to retail for that much. NO ONE.

  2. #17
    programmed by NASIR Recognized Member black orb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    RIP Chavez 1954-2013
    Posts
    7,613
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Banner Design
    • Logo Design

    Default

    >>> I still got to play lots of ps2 games, so I dont care if the thing isnt released this year..
    >> The black orb glitters ominously... but nothing happens..

  3. #18
    Score: 0 out of 2 Dignified Pauper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    6,037

    Default

    when is the japanese release date?

  4. #19

    Default

    are the realease dates still 2006 for uk?
    Last edited by final-mike; 02-27-2006 at 05:56 PM.

  5. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by final-mike
    are the realease dates still spring 2006 for uk?
    Yes, they will infact travel back in time once they've mass produced the PS3 just for the sake of the UK consumers.
    Word/s.

  6. #21
    cyka blyat escobert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Rush B! NO STOP!
    Posts
    17,742
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bladen
    I don't use the $ bucknut, I got mine for just over £300 about 3 months after it's UK release.
    Well you have to figure the money situation for the US and UK was a bit different, the US had a stronger economey then so out $$ were worth more

  7. #22

    Default

    Consoles rarely make profit, The real money is the cut Sony gets with each game sale.

  8. #23
    good evening, miss Tifa's Real Lover(really's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,085

    Default

    900 DOLAARS!??!?!?! O__O"" they jus lost a customer, if its that high i will not buy it, u can buy 3 xbox 360s with that kind of money, and 2007 if like too far away, oo wellz, NINTENDO ALL THE WAY

    I would probably go play video games or have sex (the usual) - Nominus Experse

    my mom would be like "ve? yo te dije, el internet no es bueno."

    "seriously, my mom tells me "que tu hase en eso el dia entero?" and im like "mami yo toy hablando con people" xD. spanglish, ftw." ~ liz

  9. #24
    Prinny God Recognized Member Endless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Prinny Moon
    Posts
    2,641
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RSL
    No, the whole thread. NO ONE with any idea what's going on thinks it's going to retail for that much. NO ONE.
    That applies to you too, TRL.

    And then there is Death

  10. #25

    Default

    http://news.ft.com/cms/s/90b8eb06-a0...0779e2340.html

    Wow, yet ANOTHER article about the 900 dollar pricetag.

  11. #26
    Got obliterated Recognized Member Shoeberto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    THE OC BABY
    Posts
    12,020
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    It, yet again, is cited as being a quote from the same analysts in the previous articles.


  12. #27
    Recognized Member TheAbominatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    6,838
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You

    Default

    You've got to be out of your head or just looking for a reason to bash Sony (and I'm willing to bet money on the latter), if you think they'll release it for $900.

    Really. Seriously. Pull your heads out of Nintendo's buttcrack for five seconds and rationalize. And no, I'm not bashing Nintendo. I dont go in for the console wars. Childish, says I.

    Sony will make sure the price range stays in the ballpark of the 360 and the Revolution in order to stand a chance in the market. They know what they're doing.

  13. #28
    ..a Russian mountain cat. Yamaneko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    15,927
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Uh... Microsoft and Sony always lose money on their consoles starting off. A manufacturing cost of $500+ is not unreasonable. However, if Sony wishes to sell their new console and get any money from licensing fees they know it's smart to price it around the same cost as the 360. It will NOT be more than $500.

    It also seems dubious that the PS3 would be pushed back to 2007 if Sony wishes to compete with Microsoft and Nintendo. This is just wild speculation from a source that has no more information about the future than we do.

  14. #29

    Default

    That reminds me, does anybody have the wikipedia pages showing the three consoles' predicted title lineup?

  15. #30
    Banned MecaKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,002

    Default

    I don't.
    But I'll save you the trouble. You think they all suck except for mgs 4. Except for the PS3 will be really slow and you'll be aging along with Snake.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •