1572,the year of FF8.

[Leeza]

G SpOtZ and everyone else that this applies to and you know who you are: Stay out if your only purpose is to come in to argue and complain about FEs theories.

[G SpOtZ]

i'm just doing my best to argue with the theory. it's always debatable, so i do my part and debate. the frustrating part is just that FE doesn't accept the fact that his theories are being disproven, with good evidence, and simple logic.

[Leeza]

No one is twisting you arm to come in here to disprove him.

[G SpOtZ]

what's the fun if there's nothing to argue about? ^__^

i'm sorry though, FE (and Leeza, cuz you seem annoyed by it) i do get harsh. but i'll stick with my arguments. If FE gets to spread his "knowledge" and "theories", then i can spread my knowledge and information to disprove his theories, yeah? i'll be a little lighter on the personal attacks i guess.

[Leeza]

Yes, be a lot lighter on the personal attacks if you plan to continue on.

[Future Esthar]

Add you to my tough-to-crack nut list

Many months ago I showed that my speculations could exist without violating the game even though that they can´t be proved.

Which means it is impossible to disprove them.

And "it´s a bug" arguments weren´t valid.

Consider the theory:

Edea said to Squall on her house "I was possessed by Spider Man"

This is an example of a theory which can be proved false because it clearly violates the game.
She says she was possessed by Ultimecia.

But when I say that Ellone can send one´s counsciousness to the future I am not violating the game.People can be lying,Elle might not fully understand her powers,etc...
There is an infinite amount of possibilities.

If I said that Ellone said she can send her counsciousness to the future then It can be proofed wrong.
Understood the difference?

[Shoden]

FE if you want to prove your theories use basic evidence not stuff people think are crap.

I reckon i's a good piece of noticing for the Date thing but you need it to be better quality.

[G SpOtZ]

lol. spider man possessed someone hahaha... that'd be a kickass

[G SpOtZ]

Many months ago I showed that my speculations could exist without violating the game even though that they can´t be proved.

Which means it is impossible to disprove them.

i bet square could disprove it.

[Flying Mullet]

Many months ago I showed that my speculations could exist without violating the game even though that they can´t be proved.

Which means it is impossible to disprove them.

Which also means it is impossible to prove them.

[G SpOtZ]

Many months ago I showed that my speculations could exist without violating the game even though that they can´t be proved.

Which means it is impossible to disprove them.

Which also means it is impossible to prove them.

i was gonna say that, but FE already said "...could exist without violating the game even though that they can't be proved."

[Future Esthar]

Of course,only Square.
But don´t go now send an email please.
We had to discover for ourselves.

Which also means it is impossible to prove them.

That depends on the theory.

[G SpOtZ]

why can't i go send an email?

EDIT: i REALLY REALLY WANT TO, i want to see their reaction to your theories. (not in a mean way, i'd just think it'd be interesting)

[Flying Mullet]

Which also means it is impossible to prove them.

That depends on the theory.

No, if a theory can't be proven, then it can't not be proven either.

[Del Murder]

As stated earlier, please only post in this thread if it has something to do with the original topic. If you want to give FE feedback on his 'theories', feel free to pm him. The only people who can prove or disprove any theory are the original game developers, and none of them post here. Further discussion on this subject will result in thread close and warnings given out.