Hey! I remember this! There's something on wikipedia about it. It's kinda stupid though. Jack Thompson claimed that under the censor is full frontal nudity (Nipples, pubic hair, etc.). He went on to say that it's not directly accesible, but using a simple cheat code would reveal it. This would mean they hid something from the ESRB. He also said that "Pedophiles could access these things and then re-enact what they see." What? Pedophiles? :rolleyes2 Of course, to my... I mean, a lot of teenage boys who aren't me dismay, there was no nudity under the censor. Many people stated that it was just as good as a Barbie Doll. Jack Thompson (The dumb lawyer) said "I was always aware of this." He went on to say that children, oh no, people of ALL ages should not be allowed to see this kind of content. "Even if they (The nudity parts) are just as good as Barbie and Ken dolls."

For those of you who don't know what Jack Thompson looks like, here's a picture.


Fact of the day: Jack Thompson doesn't have a good hair-cut.

For those of you who want to know what he does, here's a link to a basic explanation of what he does: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson#Activism

For those of you who want to know exactly what he does, here's a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson

o_O This Jack Thompson guy is kinda weird, as you can see. He constantly points out that games like GTA aren't for kids, and that it should be made less possible for kids to get these games. I agree with him there, but really, isn't it the parent's job to do that? The parent is there to guide the child into a good life. If a parent thinks something is bad for their children, they shouldn't allow them to get it. It's the parent's job to raise the child, not the creators of GTA. Plus, there is a mark on the back of every box that tells you the recommended age group. I say no-no to Jack.