What'd you rather...2

[Markus. D]

hmmmm.... I cant tell at the moment.

[Bowser]

drowning seems more peaceful, it doesnt have all the chaos that being trapped in a fire has. plus, its not as loud. even though it seems scarier. =/

[Shiny]

burning reasons
You're not going to survive. This is a thread about how you would rather die. sheesh.

Some people aren't pessimistic. :rolleyes2

[VorpalCyberWolf]

Depending on what kind of Fire it is, You could drown in the smoke, much like you would in the water, then burn to (In the words of Cloud Strife) "Crispy Critters in an Instant"

Personally I would go with drowning.

[McLovin']

We are made of 75% water...and still we wish to die in it.

[Tavrobel]

In this case, I'd probably go with burning, but drowning makes you panic, before you realize that you are not longer panicked... but dead. Unlike fire, which you feel every agonizing moment, until death, rather than the sure chance that you pass out. Fire wouldn't have a 100% guarantee on unconciousness.

And temperature does matter. If it were only 60 degrees Celsius, then you would die rather slowly. If it were 90l, you die much faster. The faster you fry your nerves off, the faster you don't feel anything.

[Rengori]

We are made of 75% water...and still we wish to die in it.

Last I checked that 75% of water isn't filling up your lungs or cutting off your oxygen supply.

[McLovin']

[Rengori]

What's that supposed to mean?