Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: mp3 diffrence?

  1. #1
    good evening, miss Tifa's Real Lover(really's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,085

    Default mp3 diffrence?

    whats the diffrence between 128 kbps and 320 kbps? and VBR

    does it sound better in WMA or MP3 file?

    I would probably go play video games or have sex (the usual) - Nominus Experse

    my mom would be like "ve? yo te dije, el internet no es bueno."

    "seriously, my mom tells me "que tu hase en eso el dia entero?" and im like "mami yo toy hablando con people" xD. spanglish, ftw." ~ liz

  2. #2
    Ominous Wanderer Tech Admin Samuraid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    5,522

    Default

    In general, MP3 takes the original uncompressed audio source (such as a CD) and removes information to make the size of the file smaller. The process with which it does this is somewhat complex to describe, but it basically degrades the audio quality slightly from the original audio source. The higher the bitrate, the closer to the original the MP3 file is.

    Thus, 320kbps sounds closer to the original (better) than a 128kbps file. Generally, with anything 192kbps and above, it's hard for most people to distinguish the difference between the original audio and the MP3. (although some people can)

    VBR means variable bitrate. Normally, MP3 files are encoded at a constant bitrate (CBR), a certain number of bits per second. Variable bitrate allows the MP3 encoder to vary the bitrate depending on how complex the audio waveform is, which can allow certain MP3 files to get encoded more efficiently.

  3. #3
    ..a Russian mountain cat. Yamaneko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    15,927
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I find I can distinguish up to 256kbps, which is why I try to encode all my uncompressed audio at that bitrate or in OGG format. I've been waiting for OGG to catch on for years now. Great format.

    Good thing to note is that there's no point in reencoding a compressed audio track (for example when you split a track up) to a bitrate higher than the original. You'll just end up with a bigger file with lots of useless data. I generally frown upon reencoding compressed audio in general.

  4. #4
    Ominous Wanderer Tech Admin Samuraid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    5,522

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yamaneko
    I find I can distinguish up to 256kbps
    That's one of the advantages to having a great pair of speakers.

  5. #5
    Draw the Drapes Recognized Member rubah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Now Destiny is done.
    Posts
    30,653
    Blog Entries
    21
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Even if it is a high bitrate, if you re-encode it several times the quality will still go down.

    I generally go for 196. I don't have a fancy stereo system of any sort, so that's good enough for me.

  6. #6
    星の声 starseeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In Deep Space
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    I don't notice the quality unless it's down at 16 or 32kbps
    "Reality is that which,
    when you stop believing in it,
    doesn't go away".
    Philip K. Dick

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •