These are the smallest avatars I've ever seen, and the biggest sigs I've ever seen.
Not that I'm complaining.
These are the smallest avatars I've ever seen, and the biggest sigs I've ever seen.
Not that I'm complaining.
It is true about the avatar part but I have seen sites with larger sigs before, though that is usually because there is no constraint on sig size.
You can always disable every image in your CP to save yourself future consternation. Failing that, use BoB's style.
I like the avatar sizes. I wouldn't mind the sigs being knocked down another 50 or 100 pixels or so from either side, though.
I agree with Raistlin...again. I don't like it when I do that.
Hello Pika Art by Dr Unne ~~~ godhatesfraggles
Turn off the sigs. The avatars look huge in comparison with nothingness.
Originally Posted by Leeza
Dr Unne (on AIM): Poor Leeza, losing her mind.
:rolleyes2
Well agreeing with Raistlin is a good indication of madness.
Originally Posted by Dr UnneOriginally Posted by Dr Unne from tonight's AIM convo
Well one forum I visit sparingly has 50x50 limits on avatars. Now I can act superior to everyone else, well, moreso than usual, for experiencing such an unusual thing.Does anyone else think this has the makings of a classic comedy, or is it just me?Originally Posted by Raistlin quoting Unne quoting pop culture
There is really no need for sigs. I've had them turned off for years and pretend they don't exist.
I like the limits as is really. Although, I've never been to any other forums really to see how other limits look.
Most of the message boards I've been to have 60x60 avatars, and often people have sigs that go on for several pages. The wedding planning message board I post at, for example. 60x60 avatars, but the girls' sigs have wedding countdowns, "blinkies" of their names and their fiance's names, images that say "cat lover" and crap, and often links to their wedding webpages and journals. It drives me insane.