Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: I just can't use different characters... HELP!!!

  1. #1

    I just can't use different characters... HELP!!!

    I have this problem see. People often have a varying opinion on which chracters in a game are good, and which are bad. I've been trying to experiment with different styles of play, using different characters, but when I fight, I find myself disappointed with the outcome. For instance, why use a second-rate character like Quina or Eiko, when I can use a powerhouse like steiner that always takes out wicked damage, or maybe use a healer like Garnet who has more options? I'm baffled. The good things I can see for Eiko (phoenix, and the types of carbuncle spells). I guess frog drop must really be awesome or something. Anyways, how can I help myself experience more of the game by playing with these less-likable characters, and yet not feel overwhelmed by their inadequacy?

  2. #2
    For a good majority of FFIX, you don't have a choice so it doesn't seem to big of a problem. Also, the other characters don't level up with the current party, so who you choose to use somewhere near the time you get the Blue Narcisass is what you're stuck with.

  3. #3
    Recognized Member
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight
    I use whatever ones I like the best, whether they're good at attacking or not. Sometimes I like them because they are strong fighters though xD

  4. #4
    I always use a balanced party, Having two magic users and two melee users always work best for me

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Crossblades
    I always use a balanced party, Having two magic users and two melee users always work best for me
    Zidane: Most times one of the magic-based is Garnet, and one of the melee-based is Zidane, naturally.

  6. #6
    I agree with Crossblades, having two melee user and two magic user is the best like in FFIX: I use Zidane, Vivi, Eiko and Steiner for most of the battles, and I though that Eiko have more White Magic than Garnet. Prancing Mad talk more about FFIX than the first generation so I guess this thread should be in FFIX.

  7. #7
    Its the same with me. The silly, second rate (IMO) characters like Quina, Cait Sith, Selphie, Rikku, etc always get left behind, and remain at lower levels.

    I'm very partial to the powerhouse strong physical attack characters, definitely. And its the same every time I play through a new quest of any FF.

  8. #8
    I agree with Crossblades, having two melee user and two magic user is the best like in FFIX: I use Zidane, Vivi, Eiko and Steiner for most of the battles, and I though that Eiko have more White Magic than Garnet. Prancing Mad talk more about FFIX than the first generation so I guess this thread should be in FFIX.
    Zidane: Eiko does have more white magic, but what's the point? when you have all immunities on and Auto-Regen on all characters, what's the point of White Magic besides Holy? Garnet has a better range of eidolons to choose from(Bahamut and Ark, come on, we got Bahamut dealing 9,999 damage so what's the point of waiting on Ark's long-a** FMV for an attack with an element tacked on to it?) But a two-summoner team is good, the Holy spell and the eidolon Bahamut pwn. Most of the time, my party is Zidane, Garnet, Vivi, and Eiko OR Zidane, Garnet, Vivi, and Steiner. Quina is uneeded in battle unless you catch 100 frogs and make Frog Drop 9,999 damage, then I recommend Quina in a party up against Ozma.

    EDIT - Since FFIX is a tribute anyway, I make up tribute battle tactics, in FFIV the Magus Sisters' Delta Attack comprised of Sandy reflecting(Walling at the time) Mandy, Mandy attacking, and Cindy casting Fira, Blizzara, Thundara, Bio(known as Fire2, Lit2, Ice2, Virus at the time) on Mandy to be reflected back. I created a tactic called the Delta Cannon that I do for fun, Eiko cast Carbunkle(Reflects everyone), Zidane attacks, Garnet uses a summon(Odin, Bahamut, or Ark, doesn't matter), and Vivi casts a high level on the party(it Reflects, makes a cool sound, I say "1a-2a-3a-4a") it does 9,999 damage, the process is uneeded, but it's for laughs.
    Last edited by Darth Cid; 04-25-2006 at 06:38 PM.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by vivi_ultima
    I agree with Crossblades, having two melee user and two magic user is the best like in FFIX: I use Zidane, Vivi, Eiko and Steiner for most of the battles, and I though that Eiko have more White Magic than Garnet. Prancing Mad talk more about FFIX than the first generation so I guess this thread should be in FFIX.

    Not just in FF IX, though. In any RPG

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Crossblades
    Not just in FF IX, though. In any RPG

  11. #11
    I refuse to waste my time on sucky characters that I have no use for. But, to each his own, I guess.

  12. #12

  13. #13
    I usually go off who I think is the coolest. For example in FF7 I always have Cid in my party because he's awesome.

  14. #14
    I always pick my fave and stick with them. Exept in FFX where i used whoever's skill i needed. I never used Wakka or Kimahri though. I don't think it's nessessary to use them just because they are there

  15. #15
    Oh it's not necessary to use them, but it provides a whole new experience with the game. By not having a PS2, I'm limited by what I can play. I have a massive collection though for PS ( I still have 3 games I need to actually finish playing through). Point being: Some people like characters that I consider absolutely useless. I want to figure out their style, and why they like these characters. I'm ALL about pure brawn and healing. I'd like to see what the real benefits are of using the other types of characters.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •