Quote Originally Posted by ZidaneAndGarnet
Zidane: If no FFs are based on two characters, aren't you contradicting yourself in saying FFVII and FFIX was based on two characters earlier? FFX was all about Tidus and Yuna laughing about nothing. I've played FFVIII and I don't even know who Quistis and Zell are, that's how much attention they were given...Laguna wasn't given as much attention as he should have given, providing he saved the world from Adel, but attention is still and some reason always is on Rinoa hitting on Squall. Let's drop this arguement though before we go into spam-flaming, anyway, FFX-2 was completely unneeded, I liked how the ending of FFX played out, it teaches you a lesson about live and memories and dreams, and then they make a sequel that contradicts that, and makes the lead female from the original installment look like...well, you get it. Square has yet to redeem itself for that game, FFX-2 is the worst.
FFX wasn't only 'bout Yuna and Tidus, it involved Wakka a whole lot, Lulu very very much, Auron TO DEATH! Kihmari and all the others in a very MEANINGFULL way.

Convinced?:rolleyes2 :rolleyes2 :rolleyes2

Quote Originally Posted by DarkLadyNyara
I can CLEARLY remember Quistis' importance in FFVIII, and Laguna's, and Zell's. I can CLEARLY remember Kihmari's importance, Auron's, Lulu's, Wakka's, etc.
Uh-huh. News flash-- VIII was almost entirely focused on Squall and Rinoa. Hence the logo. In IX, Vivi, and to a lesser extent Freya, get a good amount of focus- the game is not a four disc Zidane/ Garnet love story.
Don' kid yourself, just because the logo has those two characters means nothing.

You can make a poll:

Which game presents ALL characters as meaningful characters:

FFIX or FFVIII. You'll fail everytime.

PS: It is KNOWN that FFIX is focused on Garnet and Zidane with a few comical events with Steiner.
PS2: When was the last time I heard the name Eiko on these forums??? :laugh: