But it's true.
I'm just saying that my decision to not eat there isn'tgoing to do [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img], because there are 45 million other people out there who don't give a rat's ass about chickens, no matter what Bea Arthuer says.
And they all watch NASCAR.
SEXY McAWESOME TO YOU, MISTER
Its very tempting to make a joke with a sweeping generalization of black people and fried chicken right now, but I know someone would get offended and jump down my throat.
Anyway, they should do something to reduce the suffering. I wouldn't go as far as to boycott them, even if I did like there food, too greasy tasting for me. Make sure the Voltage will kill off their senses for one. And make sure they are less cramped in living spaces.
Also, I don't like the Extremists of PETA, a lot of them are okay, but some of these extremists are worse than the people doing things to the Chickens. Like throwing animal blood on people to express there points, though it doesn't happen often, only a few cases and not as bad as southpark portrayed it to be, as funny as that episode was.
Also, while i don't think animal suffering should be ignored, less money and effort should be put towards that to fix starving people and reduce human suffering.
Also, KFC is disgusting and gives me diarreah.
Why anyone would eat there in the first place is beyond me.
And Shlup is terrible at giving me reactions I want.
SEXY McAWESOME TO YOU, MISTER
It's not much worse than what is done to Chickens. Chickens can be left suffering in those places for a long period of time. A bleeding Animal that ends up in the water with Piranhas, is going to die within a short space of time.Originally Posted by Dignified Pauper
It's funny how the argument for eating Animals is that we are above them so we have the right. But as soon as the question of cruelly torturing them comes up, suddenly people want to compare themselves to Animals. There are billions of people, does that mean that you don't think we shouldn't prosecute murderers because it doesn't matter, there are billions of us?even further, what about animals, especially felines, that play with their pray, torturing it before killing it?
Your argument doesn't matter because chickens don't matter when there are millions of them.
As far as I can see it, I'm perfectly fine with cannabalism and would like some salt to eat you with!
Last edited by Anaisa; 05-30-2006 at 07:40 PM.
yes
I'm not going to read all this thread as I'm sure its full of a lot of self rightous poo from many people. Plus anyone with an onze of brain must know that to maintain the high stock they have to have many animals living together. Also you have your food cheap, they keep the animals cheaply.
If you have a problem with it you should not eat ANY fast food as they treat the animals the same anywhere.
Trust No one
I'm not going to read all of these pages because it's too much. But here's what I've got to say.
Thats a natural event though. An animal being hunted by a predator is supposed to happen. 5+ chickens all stuck in a little cage causing the legs to decompose is not right. No matter what arguement you may raise its not natural or right.
Mate are you stupid? There are billions of us. But do we farm humans like that? No. We could. And that would solve world hunger now wouldn't it? And don't give me some crap like "but they're humans" . We are not above animals. Just like I'm not above you. We have bigger brains. That's all.even further, what about animals, especially felines, that play with their pray, torturing it before killing it? Your argument doesn't matter because chickens don't matter when there are millions of them. As far as I can see it, I'm perfectly fine with cannabalism and would like some salt to eat you with!
Just thought I'd have my say. Oh BTW I'm studying to become a veteranarian
Sad yeah but not eating it isnt going to help. I love KFC, in fact im eating some tonight. Finger licking good!
But the internet, that is natural, yes?
You're going to compare suffering to a information medium? Are you ok?But the internet, that is natural, yes?
I'm going to decimate any argument which rests on the precepts of things being 'natural' (And that by being natural, they are right).You're going to compare suffering to a information medium? Are you ok?But the internet, that is natural, yes?
Alright, let's edit that quote a little bit, then.
Now what? Treat those as two seperate thoughts.
Yes, we are above animals. Good grief. Do you see animals composing epic poems in long form? Do you see animals composing orchestral symphonies? Do you see animals painting masterworks? No, no, and no. We are better than animals, and until they have language, arts, culture, politics, and philosophy*, we will remain better than animals.Mate are you stupid? There are billions of us. But do we farm humans like that? No. We could. And that would solve world hunger now wouldn't it? And don't give me some crap like "but they're humans" . We are not above animals. Just like I'm not above you. We have bigger brains. That's all.
Just thought I'd have my say. Oh BTW I'm studying to become a veteranarian
*I'm aware that some animals can learn Human languages, and a couple have their own languages - one out of five ain't good enough.
I agree with that part of it. I don't think it's right to be unecessarily cruel. I just hate the 'natural' card, because 90% of the modern world is unnatural in form, function, or composition. Or all three.
Milf knows the score.
there was a picture here
humans are a direct form of nature and life. We just are above the animals on earth because we developed the highest form of sentience. There is nothing un-natural about anything man-made because man is a part of nature itself.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
