Concession accepted. We DO know Ulti's motives, and that motive is to change the world. A tip: When attempting to argue, it helps not to agree with your oppponent's position. It also helps to be correct.Originally Posted by Viator
Viaparrot strikes again! EXPLAIN HOW.I am afraid it was you.
Why? No one is denying there is an act of absorption involved. You, on the other hand, are the only one who thinks that it is somehow a change in tactic after a critical oversight, rather than step two in the master plan.You knew that Ultimecia absorbing time so stop talking about compressing thing.
I find myself not guilty.You better judge yourself and see if you can honest to yourself.
In massive enough singularities, time stops. In the universal singularity that the universe may become, time stops. In a heat death universe, time stops as EVERYTHING stops.I know you cant prove time is finite because time never stop that means time is infinite.Because you cant prove it, just shut up.
Or maybe it means that your explanation is bunkum.You said that/my explanation is false?
That means you dont understand anything about TC.
And I don't care how many f'in times you repeat that, it doesn't make your position any more true, any more parsimonious, or any less asinine.I dont care if you stil dont understand it.
Given ANY explicitly finite set, no value within that finite set is infinite.What you write (about time is finite) is nonsense.
Prove it.Compressing time will destroyed time itself because compressing time will make time become nothingness.
I KNEW IT, I KNEW IT, I KNEW IT. I just had to wait for you to hang yourself. Your argument IS based on the dichotomy paradox. It's BUNKUM.Time has many infinite time dimensions
The number of time dimensions is infinite. This means that you cannot count how many time dimensions as it goes on forever.
Time has intervals. This means that the time dimensions have intervals between each other. In other words, it is the time difference between each time dimension. But really, there isn’t any because the difference is so small, a time dimension could equal that difference which again has interval difference that just goes on for infinity but gets smaller in difference each time.
Not only is your premise totally unfounded, but you've got your laws of causation totally backwards.Time force relies on itself to keep it going. This means that every time dimension there are, they are all needed to rely on each other to keep time itself going. If this is true, then time is infinite which is true and so this is true.
Addendum: AND your logic is circular. Backwards AND circular. Impressive. Wrong, but impressive.
Prove time A: relies upon itself B: is infinite. Then C: Reconcile time loop with infinite time. Loops are connected to themselves, connecting beginning and end to keep circling. However, this does not make an infinite amount of time. It makes recycled time.If time relies on itself to be infinite, then that must mean there is a loop of time.
Except in singularities.Time is always everywhere. Wherever anything is, there will always be time.
IF. Key word IF. You cannot base a conclusion on an unsupported premise.If time exists anywhere, then in a black hole where they say there is no time, there has to be time, or everything is nothing. It only slows it down so much it hardly moves but still does move.
Except time does NOT pass uniformly without regards to the world, even in our reality.Time is something that passes uniformly without regard to whatever happens in the world.Time is a measure of the cycles of change within the world.
A temporal singularity. And what is a singularity? A massive locale of compressed matter, and in this case, time.Absorbing time will make A New Dimension of Time where Any Dimension of Time (past,present,future and whatnot) exist together in That New Dimension of Time.
The thing about your postulate is that- despite your claim that compression of time destroys time- your end result is that very thing you said did not exist, namely, singular, compressed time.
And in the future, stop trying to use hypotheticals like they're absolutes.