[QUOTE=Skyblade;1912552]Then you may as well tell the other posts to stop referring to the Bible and Eden. So why are you telling just me to stop? I'll tell ya why: Spite. And don't deny or lie, or your nose will grow.Drop the relegion talk. It's off topic, and I don't want to wind up blasting you, Ryu, when blasting PAK is so much more fun.
Originally Posted by Pharoh Amon Khan III
Logical Fallacy? That's oxymoron in a Fantasy Discussion isn't it? And everyone looks at the name Eden and thinks "Garden" and "The Bible"... Eden can also refer to the "Beginning". Hmm... Didn't think of that one ya Pinnochio? I mean, honestly, how can you claim it as 'fallacy'... Are we looking at the same summons or what?Logical fallacy. It is not, and in fact cannot be taking its target back to the Big Bang. Simply because the target rams a galaxy, which is what causes that massive explosion, and a galaxy could not possibly have existed before the Big Bang. Also, the explosion is quite clearly caused by Eden, so arguing that the explosion is the Big Bang enters into paradox territory.
For the love of the widow. Are you still mad Pinnochio? Even more spiteful-spit. And you admitted that yourself by saying "Making for fun of PAK is more fun". That's nothing but spite. You get a STFU.
AND that IS the BIG BANG! It's how the universe, (galaxies and what not) started. What do think the clock animation represented? The target doesn't 'ram' the galaxy as so much as it shoots the target through time and hits the energy of the Big Bang just as the Big Bang occurs releasing the now expanding universe. and then is placed back in the present. Hence, Eden... The Beginning...
Now, you can't claim to judge my version of Eden without expressing your own original ideas... I mean, at least what I said makes the animation make sense.
So go ahead, state you original idea of what Eden is and the animation. I would honestly love to hear them...
ANd anyone else's...