Quick question about firebox...

[bipper]

All of you are using hacked versions of firebox.

Seriously, any idea why people are giving inconsistent responses?

It does get cut off; but it is a surfability feature - not a bug. It is called smart design. That way, you do not mouse over and get like 10x lines of text; besides - I think the w3c standards have a limit to the # of chars that can be in an alt tag. Mabey. I know I seen somthing on their site, but it may have been a smart coding blurb. Who knows, that page is a mess.

Firebox is also a network component gig; mispelling firefox just makes you look more su00pidzor

But seriously, what browser do you suggest we use bassel?

[Craig]

I don't know why the word firebox is so funny, but it is.

[Peegee]

I expect everybody to use firebox. I've installed in three out of six machines at this house (leaving my parents alone).

I just think that it should be perfect.

So any small problem like me being able to see 500 lines of text when I mouse over any image should happen.

Because it works in IE.

I'm still trying to get Firebox to have colored scrollbars, for example.

[NorthernChaosGod]

Because it works in IE.

I'm still trying to get Firebox to have colored scrollbars, for example.

Because something that IE has FF should have too? Should FF have all the bugs and exploits too?

[bipper]

PureGhetto; those are browser defiened and oft independant CSS rules. Standard w3c code is what firefox supports and goes for. Firefox has some very useful browser specific tags that affect site content - like curved border corners. That is somthing developers have been crying for years for. I beleive they are being incorparated in the CSS 3.0 model as well.

Now you scroll bar is part of your BROWSER! No webpage should influence anything in your browser with out your say so.

Bipper

[Peegee]

Bipper are you Dr Unne's alt? Because I feel like I'm arguing with him. :p

In truth though, the limit in seeing the title (my img tag has a title, not an alt tag) tag is due to w3c standards?

Why are there inconsistencies?

sigh.

I want pie.

[bipper]

Could be w3c; I can't be bothered to look them up at the moment though.
Inconsistancies could lie in different versions, different inerpetations of what you said, or what 'they' said, or prehaps other reasons. Either way, if you are using a title tag for such a reason, you really are not using it for what it is for

Also, inconsistancies in versions are kinda funny, because firefox has a new version out every once in a while; when was the last IE update?

Whee. And no, Unne and I are two very different people with completely polar views on most everything in life, except what matters; computers.