Quote Originally Posted by Pharoh Amon Khan III
Dude... Chill out. It's a game. A Fantasy game. Neither one of us can claim to be "right" or "wrong"... That's I'm saying. I'm only posting my "theories" or "theoretical views". I'm not looking to knock off anyone else.
Actually, there is such a thing as 'more right' and 'less right', even in a fantasy game. And if your postulate does not fit in with what is known about the game, it is 'less right' than one that does.

I mean, why are YOU so adamant of knocking anyone else's view/theories/whatever if it doesn't agree with yours. I've heard people theories on this subject before and some I didn't find plausiable and others I did... Either way, I never called any of them wrong or my own right...
If a theory does not fit the facts, then it needs to be corrected. Your theory does not fit the facts.

You can't just call people 'wrong'... It's no longer a 'debate' anymore... It's a mud-slinging fest.
You can call people wrong in a debate.
Of course, you act like mud slinging and debating are mutually exclusive. As long as you're not making ad homs, you can sling as much mud as you like if your argument is valid.

[quote]But you wanna make yourself "God", go ahead... Knock yourself out. I wouldn't want to detain your magnificence any longer...

Bah. Godhood is overrated.

Or anything that doesn't agree with your research. Dude,... It's fantasy. I thought this discussion would be handled like a "Star Trek/Star Wars Pseudo-Science" discussion. Apparently not. Neither one of us is right or wrong.
This IS being handled like a Trek/Wars discussion. Look into a little place called Stardestroyer.net

Hell, you 'pulled' JME out of nowhere.
No. It at least has empirical in game support from when Doc Odine was discussing it.

And I wrote Cocktrice bit YEARS ago on these very forums and yes... It met with the same adamant unprovoked resistance as now. I started posting and some like it and asked for more and then people kept bitchin' about what I was writing. It was just for fun. I still don't know why they got pissed... Just like you... Ah well...
Well, for one, you stated a theory. You provided jack all for support for it. People who like to treat this like actual science is treated- yes, they still do it for fun- like for points to be supported, preferrably with abundant evidence. They may also have disliked it because it is inconsistent with other methods of being stoned which exist within the game.
And trust me. I'm not pissed.

No, but you speak like MY ideas are a bad thing. Like I'll start an evil corruptive view of a faith. I understand your POV, but you totally diss mine. And anyone else's for that matter. Aight, so I don't believe your theory of JME... You go ape-spit and I just shrug. You start spittin' on me and I kick your ass... Er... sorry. Let's not go there... We're civilized people right?
I did not go ape[img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] over JME, and I'm curious what led you to that conclusion. The only thing resembling ape[img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] in this thread was when I got irritated with you over the SeeD issue, but that's because you refused to listen after being told numerous times that SeeDs are only located at Balamb.

Their not "flaws"... Their just discrepencies with your own view of things. Like I have discrpencies with the JME, but I haven't said "no".
They are discrepancies with the game itself. They are flaws.
And if you think there are discrepancies with JME, say what they are.

Dude, if you wrote the story or had any part in the development of the game... Then you might be in position to do so... But... You're not. :p
I don't have to have written the game to look at it, look at your theory, and point out the discrepancies between them. Now if you think there are issues with what I say, feel free to address them. But please, support your position.