Please, dear God, no. I enjoyed the first one, simply because it is about nothing. Don't take that away from me. By adding a plot, you add dimension and depth. As though I needed more complicated things in my life as of now.
Please, dear God, no. I enjoyed the first one, simply because it is about nothing. Don't take that away from me. By adding a plot, you add dimension and depth. As though I needed more complicated things in my life as of now.
i liked a couple of parts but could care less about the rest ... a sequal ... whatever,
as long as pedro is in it ... (fav. character)
Chuck Noblet: Can anyone tell me the tragic irony of the Trojan War? Tina? Tina: Um, that horses are friendly creatures yet a hollow, wooden one was used to destroy Troy? Chuck Noblet: Wrong and no. Anyone else? Chip? Chip: That the mighty warrior Achilles was killed by a small cut to his ankle. Chuck Noblet: Chip is wronger. OK, here it is. The tragic irony of the Trojan War is that though it was fought over Helen, who was young and beautiful, by the time they rescued her ten years later, she was old and ugly. Tina: But wasn't recovering the king's wife reward enough for the Greeks? Chuck Noblet: Tina, an ugly woman is never a reward.
It was a great movie, I loved the fact that it had absolutely no point to it, it seemed like you could "relax" or something. As for a sequel, no way, it might ruin the first movie.
The movie was great because it was not the same as every other movie it is good to see something without a point to it.
Still havent seen it but I still wouldnt want a sequel . Hollywood is making too many sequels.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote