Patents for making a controler vibrate, detect motion, or any other common end game goal should not exactly be allowed. The purpose of a patent is utterly retarded and thier protection goes way to far. They also seem to be handed out for nearly anything anymore. A patent that does not revolutionise a standard public domain item (as a controller) should not be smurfing patented. Endostory. All such patents do is retard and slow the progressions of technologies by overglorifying mediocre and hardly innovative ideas; As we have seen in the automobile, manufacturing, pharmesutical (walgreens sucks.), and especially software industries.Originally Posted by I'm my own MILF
Can I blame a person for protecting a patent? Yes. I can. I do not agree with their actiosn, therefore I can indeed critisize their roundabout ways to make money of retarding the progression of certain technologies.
To make matters worse, congress changed the patent laws about a year ago sp that it does not award the inventor, but the first person to file for a patent. America just became more like the rest of the God-for-saken (legal-wise) world. A pathetic step back towards beurocratic control.
Bipper
Reply With Quote